Woman who works for law firm of Hunty's attorney calls court claiming to work for GOP Hous

The utter, obscene, outrageous lawlessness of biden and his son and their attorneys and lackeys has jumped to an entirely new level.

On Tuesday morning someone claiming to be a lawyer for the House committee investigating Hunty for dozens of crimes called the court hearing the case.  She instructed the court clerk to withdraw an "amicus letter" filed by the committee.

That letter would release damning evidence about Hunty before his expected guilty plea to federal charges of tax evasion and lying on a firearms form.  

For those who don't pay attention to such crap, Merrick Garland's corrupt DOJ had offered Hunty a sweetheart deal in which he would pay no fine and get no jail time, AND would have all other investigations shut down, in exchange for pleading guilty.  Sweet.

Those crimes include money laundering, felony tax evasion (other than already admitted) and failure to register as a foreign agent.  The amicus filing included the testimony of two IRS whistleblowers who said they were prevented from investigating Hunty and "the big guy."

The court clerk, believing the person who called was indeed working for the House committee, deleted the damning amicus letter.

Tuesday afternoon the top lawyer for the House committee, Theodore Kittila, sent a letter to the judge:

>> "At 1:30 p.m. we received word that our filing had been removed from the docket.  We promptly contacted the clerk's office and were told that someone had contacted the court claiming that they worked with my office, and  asking the Court to remove this filing from the docket.
   We immediately advised that this was inaccurate. The clerk's office responded that we would need to re-file. We have done so now.">>

A court official later confirmed by email that the woman who called the clerk, claiming to work for Theodore Kittila and the House committee, was a "Jessica Bengels," and said it was important that the amicus document be removed immediately.

For young Americans:  Trying to defraud the court is a disbarment-level offense.  Of course regime lawyers never get disbarred for even the most egregious conduct.

While it's impossible to prove that the woman who called the clerks' office was Jessica Bengels, she's a real person, the director of litigation services at the New York-based law firm of Latham & Watkins, where Hunter Biden attorney Chris Clark was formerly a partner.

When Kittila confronted Hunty's attorneys about the call, they claimed the filing contained confidential tax and identifying information, and thus the amicus letter couldn't be part of court case.

Hunty attorney Chris Clark has confirmed to Kittila by email that "the managing attorney from Latham called the clerk's office to note that personal tax information of the defendant had been filed in a non-reacted manner and to inquire regarding having the information sealed, as we told you we would and as you said you understood."

Here's the big lie: "As far as I am aware *the clerk took the filing down on their own accord.* Your attempts to publicly file my client's personal financial information with no protection are improper, illegal and in violation of applicable rules ... We will seek all appropriate sanctions in response to your actions."

When Kittila fired back Clark responded "I stand by all of my statements and I hope you have an affidavit from the clerk in support of yours."

Tuesday evening the judge in the case  gave Hunty's attorneys until 9 p.m. to "show cause as to why sanctions should not be considered for misrepresentations to the Court," and noted that they had not filed any request with the court to seal the amicus letter.

With Hunty attorney Clark having confirmed Jessica Bengel's call, she is now claiming that the clerk's claim that she represented herself as working for the House committee, and was therefore authorized to withdraw the motion, was just a "miscommunication."

Of course if the clerk is married to a government official or has relatives who work for the government, the regime can easily pressure her into saying she indeed misunderstood Bengel.  But that raises the question, if Bengel did NOT represent herself as working for the House, what legitimate reason would an experienced litigation case manager for a top law firm have for calling the court clerk and instructing the clerk to remove the amicus letter, eh?

And it also seems clear that unless the clerk is inexperienced (which can easily be determined) she wouldn't have removed the letter--which she demonstrably did--unless she believed the caller was working for the House committee.

Finally: Earlier we only had the outline of the sweetheart plea deal offered by the corrupt DOJ.  Now we learn the "deal" also promised Hunty that he wouldn't be prosecuted for a wide range of other charges that haven't been publicly aired as of yet.

Hunty refused to plead guilty without that guarantee.  He's come within a hair's breadth of being able to get away with a decade of criminal activity, including potential FARA violations and other serious criminal charges that haven't been made public.

It's a scandal that biden's corrupt DOJ was willing to offer him such an absurdly generous deal.  But of course that's par for the course in banana republics.