Is it plausible that 56 million people registered to vote on or near election day 2020?

In the infamous 2020 presidential election the Lying Mainstream Media and the Democrats "officially reported" that Joe Biden got 81,282,916 votes.

Sound familiar?  Sure it does.  You've heard it a hundred times by now.  That "official" total was 15 million MORE that the history-making first half-black president got in 2012.  So let's take a look.

In 2020 roughly 168 million people were legally registered to vote.  The Mainstream Media repeatedly claimed that the "average participation rate in all states" was 67% of [some base group], and that this was a couple of percent higher than usual.  That rate was parroted by most analysts.

Question is, was that 67% of *registered voters*, or of "eligible voters"?  Because obviously there's a *huge* difference.

Now: for the math-challenged, 67% of 168 million registered voters is 112.56 million votes actually cast.  Yet the official tally of all votes reported is between 154.6 million and 155.2 million votes.

Trump is officially credited--by official state tallies and even by the mainstream Media--with having gotten 74 million votes.  So adding that to biden's 81.2 million gives 155.2 million total votes.

Now: If there were indeed 168 million registered voters, and 67% voted--so again, 112.56 million votes cast--and Trump got 74 million, that only leaves 38.56 million votes.

Yet Biden "officially" (supposedly) got 81 million votes.  So apparently the "67% participation rate" is of *eligible* voters.  And sure enough, the census bureau says 66.8% of "citizens 18 years and older" voted.

Wait...the pro-illegal mafia sued--successfully--to prevent the question "Are you a citizen of the United States" from appearing on the census form, so...wait for it...By what magic bullshit did the census lackeys arrive at the conclusion "66.8% of citizens 18 year and older" voted?

Ah, dat right:  *They couldn't know* how many people in the U.S were NOT citizens, eh?  My guess is that they were either guessing, or meant 66.8% of *all people in the U.S. 18 and over."  Hmmm...not same.

But before we go that route, let's look at those 168 million *registered* voters.  IF that number is correct, then if all votes were cast by registered voters, that would mean 92.2 percent of *registered* voters voted.  That's so far beyond the average participation rate as to be impossible.  (Google it.)

So if those two soothing, reassuring, bullshit explanations to try to make the numbers work are toast, let's look at a third possibility: that the number of *registered* voters is way, way off.  

There could be two reasons: One is that the states just didn't know how many registered voters they had.  Do Democrats claim state election workers just don't know how to add, and the machines didn't help?  Yeh, dat's it.  Reeeally.  Trust us.  Nah, don't think so.

If we assume 68% of everyone in the U.S. over 18 voted, and was registered to do so, to get 155 million votes means 224.6 registered voters.  Since there were only 168 million registered voters before the election, that would mean 56.6 million people would have had to register on election day (or whenever they appeared in person to vote, in states that allowed early in-person voting).

That's over one-third of all votes cast.  Does that seem plausible?  You'd think there'd have to be records of how many people registered on election day or just before.  Are there?  How many such registrations?

Google all this for yourself.  Did 56.6 million Americans register to vote either on election day or within a few days of it?  I'm hugely skeptical.  I'd love to see some records.  Cuz if those records don't exist, the only remaining explanation seems to be massive fraud.

Surely there's a non-fraud explanation.  I'd love to hear Democrats explain it.  But they don't care.

Source. 

https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/2020-presidential-election-voting-report.html