Minnesota Democrats control govt, pass pro-tranny bills with strict party-line vote; Media swoons

Last Thursday Democrats in the Dem-controlled Minnesota House passed HF146, on a straight party-line vote.  That bill encourages minor children to get sex-change operations in Minnesota, regardless of parental opposition.

Then the next day, in a move of astonishing speed and coordination, the state's Democrat-controlled senate passed the same bill--again on a straight party-line vote.  The Democrat governor is expected to sign it into law, to great cheers and fanfare from the Mainstream Media and the tranny mafia.  "Cuz dis law is, like, *totally* needed to protek duh chirrens!," they'll scream.

Oh wait, there's more:  Last fall an 80%-Democrat House district in the Minneapolis suburbs elected the state's first tranny representative, with 80% of the vote.  The tranny assumed office on January 3rd of this year, and immediately introduced the bill that just passed both chambers of the legislature.

"Cuz dis bill proteks duh chirren," right?

No doubt the Dem voters of that district are hailing this as a big victory, and just what they had in mind when they elected the tranny. 

Leigh Finke, first tranny rep in MN history

So here's the problem:  Like many states, Minnesota has a different LAW, giving the state the power to take kids away from their parents if someone claims the kids are being abused.  The charge doesn't have to be proven for state social welfare bureaucrats to remove the child.

Critics say the way HF146 is written, the new LAW could be used by pro-tranny Democrat bureaucrats (redundancy alert) to take a child away from parents if teachers convinced the child that "transitioning" would solve all their problems, and the parent refused to consent.

Wow, who could have foreseen THAT, eh?

Democrats: "Dat ridiculous!  Dat not possible!  You jus' a right-wing conspiracy nut!  Next you'll be telling us the state can force you to get your 6-month-old vaccinated!  You'll be telling us the government will order you fired if you refuse to take the *safe, effective* covid 'vaccine.'  That's ridiculous!"

"Next you'll be claiming that crazy story about a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was true!"

Sure, what were we thinking, eh?

And here's the hoot:  Every Mainstream Media outlet wrote this story as "this new law protects transgender *people*"  They did that to make naive readers and viewers think laws passed by other states making it illegal for children under 18 to get sex-change operations, cross-sex hormones or puberty blockers applied to adults as well.  That was totally, utterly false.  But by using the phrase "protecting transgender *people*" the casual reader misses that HUGE distinction.