Big newz yesterday from the FDA re covid. Surely it was on all the newz programs, right? Did you see it?

After reading the piece below (from a big announcement yesterday), think: Did you hear this on the "newz" last night?

No, you didn't.  And you won't.  See if you can figure out why.

Yesterday--Friday--the corruptocrats at the utterly corrupt FDA "voted" to give duh fake "vax" to children as young as 6 months old.

You knew this was coming, of course.  It should have been obvious.

Of course even a few dense Americans have heard that kids under ten or so--and certainly younger than five--are at almost zero risk from duh Chyna virus, but at a far higher risk than adults of heart inflammation from duh fake "vax."  So to avoid alarming those few parents, instead of saying "as young as 6 months old" almost every Mainstream Media outlet is instead reporting the FDA action as approving duh "vax" for "children under 5."

Sounds SO much better, eh?  Cuz

Here's how a typical leftist outlet (Axios) spun the announcement:

Why it matters: Some of the youngest Americans are now one step closer to being eligible to receive their vaccinations. Children under 5 are the last group without access to COVID vaccines.

"Today’s decision will help build on this progress, giving parents much-needed relief and peace of mind and helping our nation continue to move forward safely," President Biden said on Friday.

Pfizer and Moderna shots could start being administered to children younger than 5 years old as early as next week..

Note that reference to "5 years" again, rather than the actual approval of as young as six months.  If you think that was an accident you're naive.

"The agency determined that the known and potential benefits of the vaccines outweigh the known and potential risks in the pediatric populations authorized for use for each vaccine," the FDA said.

Wait...what is the "potential benefit" of the "vaccine," as distinguished from the "known" benefit, eh?  This is word salad, carefully selected by the FDA to camouflage the message with words that have no relevance whatsoever.  Again, it's not an accident.

Here's Axios a week ago, under the headline "The littlest Americans may finally get their shot."  Isn't it cute?  "Their" shot.

COVID shots may be days away from becoming available to infants and toddlers with expert panels set to evaluate both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna pediatric vaccines this week.

Why it matters: For *anxious parents* of America's littlest kids, this is a big moment. Children younger than 5 are the last group without access to the shots.

Driving the news: This week, both FDA and the CDC vaccine advisory boards will meet to discuss the vaccines, which could ultimately lead to emergency use authorization and a recommendation.

Here's Axios again, this time on Friday:

What they're saying: "Many parents, caregivers and clinicians have been waiting for a vaccine for younger children and this action will help protect those down to 6 months of age," FDA commissioner Robert M. Califf said.

"Will help protect..." and "Many parents have been waiting (anxiously!!) for a vaccine..."  This is called "the bandwagon effect:"  "All smart, caring parents are anxious to get their precious children protected by this totally safe, totally effective vaccine!  You're a good parent, right?  You surely don't want your child to DIE because you REFUSED to get your precious child "their shot" the very day it became available, right?"

"Those trusted with the care of children can have confidence in the safety and effectiveness of these COVID-19 vaccines and can be assured that the agency was thorough in its evaluation of the data," Califf said.

Ah. "Safe!  And effective!"  Safe, and effective.  Safe-and-effective!  Repeat til it sinks in citizen: Safeandeffective!

To understand how utterly, utterly stupid and corrupt this "ruling" is, consider this: About 43,000 women in the U.S. die from breast cancer every year.  If the FDA or CDC were to recommend that all girls have their breasts removed at 15 to totally prevent 43,000 deaths every year, most Americans would correctly view this as insane. 

Now let's see how that insane "recommendation" compares to the FDA and CDC demands that you get your six-month to five-year-olds jabbed:

How many kids younger than 5 have died from duh Chyna virus?  Here's a typical story (USA Today, so...) supposedly telling you that.

The piece goes on for breathless 'graf after 'graf implying "Ghastly risk! All your kids are gonna DIE!" before finally saying (near the end),

How many kids have died of COVID-19?   Of the 73 million children in the U.S., fewer than 700 have died of COVID-19 during the course of the pandemic, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

Wait...that didn't tell you the age of the 700 victims, right?  But this is the only figure in the article. How did the reporter or CDC define "children"?  The article doesn't say.

THERE'S A REASON FOR THAT.  You have to do your own research to find that "73 million children" is everyone under 18.  So of the 700 "children" the CDC says died with covid, how many were under five years old (the age group the FDA is now pushing to get the jab)?

Good luck finding that figure on the CDC website.  That's because they do NOT want you to know that the figure is TINY.

Here's a link to the CDC website that's supposed to break down covid deaths by age.  I've never been able to get it to load.  Maybe you'll have better luck.

From previous research months ago, before the CDC carefully hid the numbers, the number of deaths of kids under 5 is around 40.  And that's just "with" covid, not "from."

We can get an idea of the figure from old news stories the CDC hasn't been able to scrub from the Net.  Last Octobe Fiona Havers, a member of the CDC's "COVID-19 Response Team," said that from the start of 2020 through October 16, 2021, 94 children between the ages of 5 and 11 died of COVID.  And almost all of those had "comorbidities."

But again, this is ages 5 to 11, NOT under-fives.  Now the CDC has as one of its missions keeping track of deaths and ages, so it knows the number of under-five deaths.  It just won't tell you.  But we can get an idea based on the percentage of children under 5 compared to the size of the 5-to-11 age group.  And again, most of those victims had comorbidities.

So the corrupt FDA assures you that the vax is safe, even though there have been no long-term studies.  (Obviously there cannot have been any studies longer than six months before the "vax" was approved for "emergency use only.")  Yet it assures you the "vax" is so totally safe that it's just cleared kids as young as six MONTHS to take it, knowing that it poses a far greater risk to young people than to adults.

SO...43,000 U.S. women die every year from breast cancer, but if the FDA or CDC were to "recommend" that every U.S. girl get mastectomies at age 15, people would revolt.  But when the FDA recommends a dangerous "vax" be given to 18 MILLION children as young as six months old, when the total number of deaths per year due to the Chyna virus is roughly 40, no one bats an eye.

Such is the power of what's been accurately called "fear porn:"  The Media and quacks like Fauci bombard you 24/7 warning you that you're gonna DIE (or worse, your kids are) UNLESS you take duh "vax."  But the numbers--which they are trying hard to keep you from discovering--show this is insane, stupid.

What could possibly account for a decision this stupid, eh?

CDC: "Your numbers of deaths under five years old are wrong, you stupid deplorable!"

Okay, asshole, give us what YOU claim the real numbe is.

CDC:  "No."

Here's the senile, corrupt fake "president" again, per Axios:

Biden said that with the FDA authorization, the administration "will begin shipping millions of vaccine doses for kids to thousands of locations parents know and trust — including pediatricians’ offices, children’s hospitals, and pharmacies."

"As doses are delivered, parents will be able to start scheduling vaccinations for their youngest kids as early as next week," he said. 

Ah. "...to locations parents knnow and trust."  Because all good citizens trust their government, right?  The regime would never lie to you about the number of vax deaths or serious injuries, or try to get you to believe the official numbers weren't reliable, eh?

The regime's FDA would never try to conceal  data on the vaxes and their trials by claiming it would take the FDA 75 YEARS to "clear" all that data for public release, eh?

The CDC would NEVER participate in a wildly successful trial of safe, inexpensive ivermectin in India's Uttar Pradesh state and then a) claim they knew nothing about that trial they co-sponsored; and then b) conspired to prevent Americans from getting ivermectin, even though FDA approved for human use, eh?

SO...trust is really important to your regime rulers.  All the things they've done scream that they are NOT trustworthy, but no matter: Six months from now 90% of liberals' and Demovrats' kids from six months to five years will have been jabbed.  

In the next month watch for a deluge of interviews on the "newz" showing elite, trendy, cool parents bragging about having gotten their two-year-old jabbed.  "We're SO relieved that the president's wonderful people in the CDC and FDA have allowed us to protect our precious kids!" they'll gush.

Eighty years ago author George Orwell predicted the effect of endless propaganda on sheep: It produced the infamous maxim "Ignorance is Strength."