Porridgebrain's press secretary says the regime is fine with mobs protesting outside justices' homes

It's logical and reasonable to assume that biden's press secretary conveys regime policy.  Thus the following exchange between White House reporter Peter Doocy and press sec Psaki is revealing:

Doocy: “You guys spent some time yesterday talking about what you think are … extreme wings of the Republican Party.  Do you think the progressive activists that are now planning protests outside of justices’ houses are extreme?”

Psaki: “Peaceful protest? No.  Peaceful protest is not extreme.”

While that's literally true, the clear, unmistakeable message is that the biden regime just approved mobs protesting outside the homes of the judges the regime wants to intimidate.  

Imagine if Trump's press secretary had said the same thing...

Doocy: “Some of these justices have young kids...Would the president think about waving off activists who want to go into residential neighborhoods in Virginia and Maryland?”

Psaki: “We certainly encourage people to keep it peaceful and not resort to any level of violence. Let me tell you what I was referring to and what the president was referring to yesterday.”

Notice how Psaki refuses to answer the question.  By refusing to answer the question she again implies that the regime approves of mobs protesting outside peoples' homes.  How would the Media have reacted had Trump's press secretary urged the same thing?

Doocy:  "Activists posted a map with the home addresses of the Supreme Court justices.   Is that the kind of thing this president wants to help your side make their point?”

Psaki:  “Look, I think the president’s view is that there’s a lot of passion, a lot of fear, a lot of sadness from many, many people across this country about what they saw in that leaked document.”

Doocy:  “He doesn’t care if they’re protesting outside the Supreme Court or outside someone’s private residence?” 

Psaki:  “I don’t have an official U.S. Government position on where people protest.  We want it of course to be peaceful … I think the point here, the reason people are protesting, is because women across the country are worried about their fundamental rights that have been law for 50 years. Their rights to make choices about their own bodies and their own health care are at risk. That’s why people are protesting — they’re unhappy, they’re scared.”

When a ruling regime approves mobs demonstrating outside the homes of judges, that's "reckless endangerment."  If the Trump administration had done this exact same thing, the Mainstream (pro-Democrat) Media would be screaming bloody murder--and understandably so.  But Psaki excuses this thuggery, this intimidation, by saying protesters are "unhappy" and "scared." 

Oh, well then, that makes everything fine, eh?