Biden admin paid major netwoks and *hundreds* of papers and TV stations to push the vax and spike negative stories

Two days ago Chris Pandolfo at Blaze Media revealed that his media organization had filed FOIA requests asking for documents or emails about the Biden administration paying hundreds of U.S. corporate-media outlets--including major papers and networks--to print or broadcast stories that the covid vaccines were safe and effective.

The documents revealed that virtually every mainstream media outlet took money from the Biden Administration to run both ads and "news stories" claiming the vaccines were safe and effective.  But two insiders claim managers told them not to run stories claiming the vaxes had dangerous side effects--an entirely different matter.

Moreover, not one of the mainstream outlets disclosed the regime payments to their viewers or reader.  And shockingly, even media outlets widely derided as "conservative"--including Fox and Newsmax--took the cash and went along with the rest of the dishonest media.

(For young Americans, neither Fox News nor Newsmax is actually conservative.)

The documents revealed that after congress appropriated a BILLION dollars to pay for media ads pushig the vax, Biden's HHS purchased advertising on all the major news networks--including ABC, CBS, and NBC, as well as cable TV news stations Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC--and on major newspapers including the New York Post, the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post, and on digital media outlets like BuzzFeed and Newsmax.  But alongside the ads were dozens of what seemed to be straight news stories and "interviews with medical experts."

HHS made the same offer to hundreds of local newspapers and TV stations.  In total, those outlets published thousands of glowing articles and video segments about the vaccines--always claiming they were both safe and effective.

But that's only half the story: According to insiders at one media company, editors were instructed that they were to avoid printing or broadcasting any stories about adverse effects.  As a result, almost no negative stories appeared about the vaccines on mainstream outlets— because part of the "deal" HHS made with the outlets was to avoid running negative stories.

In other words, almost every mainstream media outlet took the money to run pro-vax ads--while pushing what appeared to be straight "news" stories about the safety and effectiveness of the vaxes, and spiking all negative stories.  

Now that the so-called "vaccines" have been shown to be not only ineffective but also dangerous, you'd think the American news media would investigate.  But they won't because they're all implicated in taking the cash without telling the public that they'd taken money from the biden regime to push lies.

Former Newsmax reporter Emerald Robinson says that last year two Newsmax executives told her not to submit any negative coverage of the vaccines.  She says she got versions of this warning several times from different executives.

She says she discussed the order not to run negative vaccine coverage with other Newsmax producers and top anchors at the time, and said they were aware that they if they ran a negative story about the vaxxes there would be "repercussions from the network."

She says she was told that medical experts who were critical of the vaxes were not to be booked as guests.  In other words, the Biden administration's "ad buys" did more than just pay the outlets for pro-vaccine advertising, but also got the outlets to spike any negative stories.  

It should be noted that the CEO of Newsmax, Chris Ruddy, is strongly pro-vax, and has ordered all employees to get the jab or be fired.

Meanwhile, Fox News executive are continuing to enforce vax mandates on their employees — even though the federal mandates have been temporarily suspended by the courts. Fox is even offering $500 to employees who take the jab.
 
According to a source familiar with the FOIAs, the Biden administration wouldn’t release the amounts it paid each outlet, claiming those amounts fell under a “trade secrets” exemption.

Source: