FINALLY! Review panel destroys the paper that set up the corrupt PCR test. Consequences HUGE

The official Narrative says the Chinese virus appeared in the U.S. in January of 2020.  

Of course that was a LONG time ago, so you probably don't remember it.  In fact that's probably earlier than the memory of any living person.  But just play along for a minute.

On January 23rd of 2020 a scientific paper--the "Corman-Drosten paper"--was submitted to the journal "Eurosurveillance," specifying a test claimed to detect the virus.  Astonishingly, the journal published this paper exactly ONE DAY after it was submitted.

If you're not familiar with the policy of "scientific journals," papers in real scientific journals are normally reviewed by other experts in the field before being published, to ensure the "science" doesn't have  flaws that would invalidate the paper's conclusions.  This typically takes at least 60 days or longer.  But in this case there was no time for peer review.  That alone should raise huge red flags.  But in this case, the entire mainstream media ignored those flags.

Eventually you'll figure out why.

The test the paper specified was called the "polymerase chain reaction" (PCR) test, and it instantly became THE approved test for whether a person "had the virus."  And if it was positive, you were counted as "a case," even if that person didn't have a single symptom.  Hmmm....

Now a team of 22 scientists has reviewed the Corman-Drosten paper and has found ten major flaws. The review concludes that the PCR test is totally unsuitable as a means for diagnosis – and the consequences are huge.

Among the flaws that make the PCR test unreliable are that the test can't tell the difference between the whole virus and viral fragments, which can't spread the disease.

But a second flaw is even worse:  The results of the PCR test depend on the number of "cycles" users choose to run.  Some studies have shown that when the PCR test is run at 40 cycles, it produces false positives up to 97 percent of the time.

The kicker is that at least four of the authors of the Corman-Drosten paper have severe conflicts of interest: Two are members of the editorial board of the journal that published the paper.  Wow, no conflict there, eh?  And at least three of the authors are on the payroll of the first companies to perform PCR testing!  

Starting to see the fix yet?

The implications of discovering that the PCR test is nearly useless, and that the paper describing it wasn't peer-reviewed before being published, and that four of the authors had clear conflicts of interest, are enormous.  Specifically:  

Everything Democratic governors have done to lock down their citizens is based on the huge *reported* number of cases, which you get when you run the universal PCR test at high cycles.  Because the test--as currently being run at high cycle settings--gives up to 97% false positives, the entire panic has been a huge overreaction.  It's very likely that barely more than three percent of the *reported* cases are really  infected with the Chinese virus.

Why was the Corman-Drosten paper rushed to publication in January, despite clearly not being peer-reviewed?  Why did none of the checks designed to prevent bad science being used to drive public policy block the catastrophic Democrat policies?  And why did it take so long for anyone in the scientific community to challenge its faulty methodology?

You all know why: Democrats wanted the virus, in order to kill Trump's roaring economy, wanted the virus to make people accept fraud-inviting 100% mail-in voting.  Ordinary Dem voters have no idea what's going on, but if you don't think top Democrat leaders wanted this you're too dumb to breathe.

So what should be done now?  Certainly all PCR tests based on the Corman-Drosten protocol should be stopped immediately, and everyone currently hospitalized as an alleged current ‘Covid case’, based on that  woefully flawed protocol, should be re-tested at 30 cycles.  All present and previous Covid deaths, cases, and ‘infection rates’ should be re-evaluated.

Finally, you'd think the people who wrote and published the incompetent Corman-Drosten paper would be held accountable.  But of course they won't be.  Because no scam that benefits Democrats is ever punished.

And by the way:  ONE HOUR after Biden was sworn in, the World Health Organization issued a press release saying that the PCR test was unreliable at high cycle thresholds--essentially ratifying everything written above.  

One.  Hour.  But scientists knew this last August.  Hmmm....