How can we detect vote fraud? And if massive fraud is clear, what would the Supreme Court do about it?
It's looking as though the November election will be absolutely awash with fraud.
Of course the leaders of the Democrat party shriek that there's no such thing as vote fraud, despite wave after wave of proven fraud. Hmmm...why would they claim there's no vote fraud if... Oh, right. Got it.
How will we be able to recognize--clearly and unequivocally--if vote fraud has occurred?
One of the obvious ways is if more votes are tallied in a precinct than the number of registered voters in that precinct. (Before Dem-ruled states decided to mail ballots to every registered voter, it was possible to compare the number of votes tallied to the number of signatures in the voting book in each precinct. But now that safeguard has been eliminated. Hmmm....)
But there's another, less obvious way: In states that allow in-person voting as well as mail-in, we can compare the percentage of mailed-in Democrat versus Republican votes to the percentage of in-person votes. Those two percentages should be fairly close. If they're way, way off--say the in-person votes are 52-48 for Trump but the mail-in's are 80-20 for Biden--that suggests major fraud.
Now for the benefit of my liberal friend: Yes, even without fraud we can expect a higher percentage of mail-in votes will be for Biden, since the Dems aren't worried about fraud and thus will be less motivated to vote in person. Similarly, we'd expect more Republican voters to vote in-person.
Now here's the real problem: If there ARE far more votes tallied than the number of registered voters in a precinct, such that the election is apparently narrowly won, does anyone believe the Supreme Court will invalidate the apparent winner because of evidence of vote fraud?
I'm absolutely certain the court would NOT do that, as it would leave Trump in office for the months it would take to investigate the results. If Biden wins, narrowly, then even with clear evidence of massive vote fraud, the Media will scream--without evidence, of course-- that either there was NO fraud, or not enough to make a difference.
They'll also scream that we dare not leave Trump in office for the months it would take to do a careful investigation. So the results will stand, even if clearly fraudulent.
Remember, you heard it here first.
Of course the leaders of the Democrat party shriek that there's no such thing as vote fraud, despite wave after wave of proven fraud. Hmmm...why would they claim there's no vote fraud if... Oh, right. Got it.
How will we be able to recognize--clearly and unequivocally--if vote fraud has occurred?
One of the obvious ways is if more votes are tallied in a precinct than the number of registered voters in that precinct. (Before Dem-ruled states decided to mail ballots to every registered voter, it was possible to compare the number of votes tallied to the number of signatures in the voting book in each precinct. But now that safeguard has been eliminated. Hmmm....)
But there's another, less obvious way: In states that allow in-person voting as well as mail-in, we can compare the percentage of mailed-in Democrat versus Republican votes to the percentage of in-person votes. Those two percentages should be fairly close. If they're way, way off--say the in-person votes are 52-48 for Trump but the mail-in's are 80-20 for Biden--that suggests major fraud.
Now for the benefit of my liberal friend: Yes, even without fraud we can expect a higher percentage of mail-in votes will be for Biden, since the Dems aren't worried about fraud and thus will be less motivated to vote in person. Similarly, we'd expect more Republican voters to vote in-person.
Now here's the real problem: If there ARE far more votes tallied than the number of registered voters in a precinct, such that the election is apparently narrowly won, does anyone believe the Supreme Court will invalidate the apparent winner because of evidence of vote fraud?
I'm absolutely certain the court would NOT do that, as it would leave Trump in office for the months it would take to investigate the results. If Biden wins, narrowly, then even with clear evidence of massive vote fraud, the Media will scream--without evidence, of course-- that either there was NO fraud, or not enough to make a difference.
They'll also scream that we dare not leave Trump in office for the months it would take to do a careful investigation. So the results will stand, even if clearly fraudulent.
Remember, you heard it here first.
posted by SF at
1:05 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home