Latest court-ordered sex-change...on a 7-year-old boy!
For the past year I've posted stories about various power-mad pencil-neck government martinets ORDERING that a young kid be taken away from his or her parents because the kid wants to "be" the opposite sex. Typically the parents are split on this: One--usually Dad--thinks this is a passing craze that will sort itself out in a few years.
By contrast, Mom is more attuned to the popular fad of "gender-reassignment surgery" so is much more likely to agree with the government ass-hat. And poof! an idiot judge or bureaucrat orders that the kid--almost always a boy--shall be given hormone and surgery to make him a fake-girl.
Typically this happens in places like the U.K. or Canada or our east or west coast, where both politicians, the media and parents have submitted totally to the tranny lobby and the maniacal push to "change a kid's sex." But between power-mad, pro-tranny, idiot judges and anti-male psychiatrists and docs, it's getting worse.
In the latest outrage a divorced couple had joint custody of a 7-year-old son. The ex-wife insisted that the boy really wants to be a girl, who she's re-named "Luna." The boy told dad he doesn't want that but has gone along with mom to keep her happy. Hard to know how much is true, but as you'll see, that ain't the point.
Mom is a doctor, in fact a pediatrician, and told dad she planned to start the son on a full sex-change course, starting with puberty-blocking drugs, then female hormones, then surgery. Dad objected, arguing that his ex-wife was forcing the son's sex-change against the boy’s will.
At the trial expert witnesses testified that a 7-year-old couldn't fully understand the potential side effects of such a course of action.
A black female judge--Kim Cooks--led the jury to a ruling against the father, awarding full custody to the demented mother. This means the mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, has the full authority of the state gruberment to start him on puberty blockers and then female hormones.
She also asked the court to forbid the father from from calling his son by his given, legal name – and that he be prohibited from bringing James around anyone who refused to “affirm” the boy as a girl.
The ruling means the father will be required to “affirm” James as a girl, despite his religious and moral objections--and in a crowning outrage will also be forced to take a class on transgenderism.
To add to the worry about this: It happened in Dallas, Texas--which you'd think would take a dim view of letting a parent force a sex-change on a 7-year-old boy, regardless of whether the kid "identified" as female. But judges have absolute authority, eh?
Hey, just go along, comrade. After all, "it's for the children!"
Full story here:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/
By contrast, Mom is more attuned to the popular fad of "gender-reassignment surgery" so is much more likely to agree with the government ass-hat. And poof! an idiot judge or bureaucrat orders that the kid--almost always a boy--shall be given hormone and surgery to make him a fake-girl.
Typically this happens in places like the U.K. or Canada or our east or west coast, where both politicians, the media and parents have submitted totally to the tranny lobby and the maniacal push to "change a kid's sex." But between power-mad, pro-tranny, idiot judges and anti-male psychiatrists and docs, it's getting worse.
In the latest outrage a divorced couple had joint custody of a 7-year-old son. The ex-wife insisted that the boy really wants to be a girl, who she's re-named "Luna." The boy told dad he doesn't want that but has gone along with mom to keep her happy. Hard to know how much is true, but as you'll see, that ain't the point.
Mom is a doctor, in fact a pediatrician, and told dad she planned to start the son on a full sex-change course, starting with puberty-blocking drugs, then female hormones, then surgery. Dad objected, arguing that his ex-wife was forcing the son's sex-change against the boy’s will.
At the trial expert witnesses testified that a 7-year-old couldn't fully understand the potential side effects of such a course of action.
A black female judge--Kim Cooks--led the jury to a ruling against the father, awarding full custody to the demented mother. This means the mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, has the full authority of the state gruberment to start him on puberty blockers and then female hormones.
She also asked the court to forbid the father from from calling his son by his given, legal name – and that he be prohibited from bringing James around anyone who refused to “affirm” the boy as a girl.
The ruling means the father will be required to “affirm” James as a girl, despite his religious and moral objections--and in a crowning outrage will also be forced to take a class on transgenderism.
To add to the worry about this: It happened in Dallas, Texas--which you'd think would take a dim view of letting a parent force a sex-change on a 7-year-old boy, regardless of whether the kid "identified" as female. But judges have absolute authority, eh?
Hey, just go along, comrade. After all, "it's for the children!"
 |
| Mom who got court to order 7-year-old son's sex-change |
Full story here:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/
posted by SF at
1:51 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home