Iowa supreme court rules taxpayers must pay for sex-change ops; outraged California Dem A-G retaliates
Last March a bunch of morons on Iowa's Supreme Court ruled that taxpayers could be forced
to pay for sex-change operations.
Let that sink in for a minute: according to the elites on the court, any Iowan who decides he or she wants to claim to be the opposite sex can DEMAND that taxpayers pay for their sex-change operation.
Of course the court didn't say "sex change," because that would lead far too many sane Americans to realize the morons are running the asylum. You can't change your sex. So the elites--from university and government down thru the scum who lie to you for the Lying Mainstream Media--all call it "gender reassignment surgery."
Oh wow, that DOES sound LOTS better, eh? "Reassignment." Like when a member of the military is ordered to a new post. Veddy, veddy normal and uncontroversial, eh comrade?
Well...while anyone can do anything they like to themselves with their own cash, the remaining sane people in Iowa weren't thrilled about being FORCED to pay for some wacko's sex-change--and they said so, loud and clear. So two months later the legislature passed a bill saying "We aren't gonna do that." And the state's Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed it into law.
The tranny mafia was outraged, and quickly struck back: They got Xavier Becerra--the seemingly corrupt attorney-general of California--to retaliate for this horrible offense, by ordering that no funds paid to the state of California by its suffering residents could be used to pay for travel to Iowa.
About the only people who were inconvenienced by this were California's public college sports teams, which have been forced to use private funds to attend any NCAA games in Iowa.
Of course this isn't the end of the story by far: The law will be challenged, probably by the ACLU, on the grounds that "it's just not FAIR that poor people can't make state taxpayers pay to change their sex." Cuz after all, taxpayers are forced to pay for boob jobs, right?
Wait, you say that's NOT the case? In any state?
Gosh, that's...odd. Wait, that seems pretty reasonable. But wait...SURELY taxpayers pay for liposurgery, right? I mean, think how traumatizing being fat is to many people. So surely...?
You say the courts haven't ordered that either? Gee...seems to most of us that if taxpayers don't pay for that, it's kinda hard to make the case that taxpayers be FORCED to pay for sex-change ops, eh?
Well, unless trannies are a specially-protected class, with special rights. Then it would make sense.
===
For the full story click here.
Let that sink in for a minute: according to the elites on the court, any Iowan who decides he or she wants to claim to be the opposite sex can DEMAND that taxpayers pay for their sex-change operation.
Of course the court didn't say "sex change," because that would lead far too many sane Americans to realize the morons are running the asylum. You can't change your sex. So the elites--from university and government down thru the scum who lie to you for the Lying Mainstream Media--all call it "gender reassignment surgery."
Oh wow, that DOES sound LOTS better, eh? "Reassignment." Like when a member of the military is ordered to a new post. Veddy, veddy normal and uncontroversial, eh comrade?
Well...while anyone can do anything they like to themselves with their own cash, the remaining sane people in Iowa weren't thrilled about being FORCED to pay for some wacko's sex-change--and they said so, loud and clear. So two months later the legislature passed a bill saying "We aren't gonna do that." And the state's Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed it into law.
The tranny mafia was outraged, and quickly struck back: They got Xavier Becerra--the seemingly corrupt attorney-general of California--to retaliate for this horrible offense, by ordering that no funds paid to the state of California by its suffering residents could be used to pay for travel to Iowa.
About the only people who were inconvenienced by this were California's public college sports teams, which have been forced to use private funds to attend any NCAA games in Iowa.
Of course this isn't the end of the story by far: The law will be challenged, probably by the ACLU, on the grounds that "it's just not FAIR that poor people can't make state taxpayers pay to change their sex." Cuz after all, taxpayers are forced to pay for boob jobs, right?
Wait, you say that's NOT the case? In any state?
Gosh, that's...odd. Wait, that seems pretty reasonable. But wait...SURELY taxpayers pay for liposurgery, right? I mean, think how traumatizing being fat is to many people. So surely...?
You say the courts haven't ordered that either? Gee...seems to most of us that if taxpayers don't pay for that, it's kinda hard to make the case that taxpayers be FORCED to pay for sex-change ops, eh?
Well, unless trannies are a specially-protected class, with special rights. Then it would make sense.
===
For the full story click here.
posted by SF at
4:29 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home