Official narrative is that Epstein committed suicide. Really?

I've now read at least a dozen articles on Mainstream Media sites, pushing the idea that Epstein committed suicide.  You may recall that this was what every media outlet was reporting within minutes of the announcement that he'd been found dead--obviously long before anyone could have rationally concluded that the death was indeed a suicide.

Having extensively studied the JFK assassination, and all the ridiculously brazen lies--explicit and implicit--pushed by the Warren Commission, this is amusing.  If you have power, it's absurdly easy to get people to believe whatever you want them to.  Known facts that contradict the official narrative are either ignored or buried.  Witnesses whose testimony doesn't support the narrative aren't called to testify.

For example, in the report on JFK's assassination, the FBI extensively test-fired the scoped rifle Lee Oswald left on the sixth floor of the Texas Schoolbook Depository.  The agent who fired the rifle reported that the telescopic sight was so far off the actual aim point that any round fired using the sight would have missed Kennedy by over six feet.

Most of you have probably never fired a scoped rifle, so you don't understand the significance of this.  It means that anyone using the scope to aim the rifle would have missed.  And while one might blindly fire and get a lucky hit, the narrative required that Oswald hit Kennedy twice.  You might get the million-to-one unaimed, lucky hit once, but not twice out of 3 shots.

To repeat: the results of the test-firing conclusively, absolutely ruled out the theory that Oswald's rifle was the murder weapon.  Yet that was the selected official narrative.

Oooh, what to do??  Oh, here's an idea!  Simply...ignore it.  And they did.  And no one batted an eye, because the inconvenient fact--one that should have destroyed the entire official story, and couldn't be explained away--was simply outweighed by a number of other bits of testimony.

Obviously one person could have destroyed the Narrative: Oswald.  Solution?  Astonishingly, he was allowed to walk into the Dallas police station just before Oswald--the most high-value prisoner in the country--was to be moved, and to get to within a few feet of Oswald before fatally shooting him. 

"Nothing to see here, citizen.  Move along!  All just coincidence."

With this background, let's look at Epstein's amazingly-convenient death:  Clearly suicide is an obvious possibility--but what are the odds of all the following necessary things happening:

• no video on the cell of the most important witness in the entire system;
• someone--so far unidentified--took him off suicide watch, despite what was claimed to have been a prior suicide attempt just two weeks earlier;
• someone--so far unidentified--transferred his cellmate to another cell earlier that evening;
• finally something easy to understand: guards not checking on him as required, and even falsifying logs to say they had done timely checks.

For those unfamiliar with statistics, when several unrelated things must happen to produce a result, the probability of the outcome happening by chance is the product of the individual probabilities.

Translation: The odds of all these things happening by chance, within the necessary time window, are in the neighborhood of one in a million.

Without video we'll never know for sure, but here are some things to watch for when the "official report" is issued: 

• Did investigators determine who ordered Epstein's cellmate moved?
• What time was the order given to move him?
• How common is it to move a prisoner to another cell at any time?
• How common is it to move a prisoner at the time Epstein's cellmate was moved?
• Did investigators ask every guard in the facility to list their location and movements around the time of the alleged suicide?
• Did investigators confirm that testimony using tapes from the video cameras that were supposedly all over the facility?

If authorities claim security cameras either malfunctioned, or their video wasn't recording, or any excuse for not providing same, or if there are gaps in the record, it adds yet another unlikelihood to the Narrative.  Sort of like the astonishing plea deal Epstein got from Acosta.

Or like FBI only getting around to searching Epstein's island today instead of way back in 2001.