Female Democrat member of congress appears to have commited immigration fraud; Mainstream media uninterested
Using sham marriages to gain American citizenship is a felony--a violation of federal law.
If you're an "ordinary citizen" and arranged a sham-marriage to your own brother in order to (fraudulently) gain U.S. citizenship for him, you'd be prosecuted.
But surely everyone has noticed by now that the U.S. effectively has two sets of laws: one for "ordinary" citizens like you and me, and a second, far more lenient set for members of what can only be described as favored classes.
One of the mainstream media's new darlings is a Somali woman from Minnesota, Ilhan Omar. Her darling status is due to the fact that she's a) female; b) an immigrant from Somalia; c) a person of color; and d) a newly-elected, virulently anti-Trump Democrat member of the U.S. congress.
Before the 2018 midterm election a Somali group noted that the candidate appeared to have married her brother to gain him U.S. citizenship, even though she claimed to be married to another man she claimed as her husband, and with whom she'd had 3 children.
An attorney from Minneapolis, Scott Johnson, investigated these claims, found they were supported, and asked the then-candidate's campaign to comment.
The campaign simply declined to respond.
How do you think members of the Mainstream Media would have reacted if this same charge was made against a Republican female? Sure: they would have demanded answers, and would have made the story front-page news until the candidate or campaign responded.
If the candidate won, still ignoring the charges against her, every news story involving that candidate would mention the apparent felony immigration fraud she apparently committed. But in this case, when the alleged felon is a Democrat and immigrant? Crickets.
But you must trust the Mainstream Media, citizen. If they don't tell you about something, either it didn't happen or it's not at all relevant to...anything. Or they'll say they didn't tell you because "it's of local interest only."
Yeh, dat's da ticket.
They Lying Mainstream Media: Where double-standards rule.
If you're an "ordinary citizen" and arranged a sham-marriage to your own brother in order to (fraudulently) gain U.S. citizenship for him, you'd be prosecuted.
But surely everyone has noticed by now that the U.S. effectively has two sets of laws: one for "ordinary" citizens like you and me, and a second, far more lenient set for members of what can only be described as favored classes.
One of the mainstream media's new darlings is a Somali woman from Minnesota, Ilhan Omar. Her darling status is due to the fact that she's a) female; b) an immigrant from Somalia; c) a person of color; and d) a newly-elected, virulently anti-Trump Democrat member of the U.S. congress.
Before the 2018 midterm election a Somali group noted that the candidate appeared to have married her brother to gain him U.S. citizenship, even though she claimed to be married to another man she claimed as her husband, and with whom she'd had 3 children.
An attorney from Minneapolis, Scott Johnson, investigated these claims, found they were supported, and asked the then-candidate's campaign to comment.
The campaign simply declined to respond.
How do you think members of the Mainstream Media would have reacted if this same charge was made against a Republican female? Sure: they would have demanded answers, and would have made the story front-page news until the candidate or campaign responded.
If the candidate won, still ignoring the charges against her, every news story involving that candidate would mention the apparent felony immigration fraud she apparently committed. But in this case, when the alleged felon is a Democrat and immigrant? Crickets.
But you must trust the Mainstream Media, citizen. If they don't tell you about something, either it didn't happen or it's not at all relevant to...anything. Or they'll say they didn't tell you because "it's of local interest only."
Yeh, dat's da ticket.
They Lying Mainstream Media: Where double-standards rule.
posted by SF at
11:35 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home