"Responsibility to Protect" no longer operative

Remember the new Obama/Hillary doctrine for Libya named "Responsibility to Protect"?

So we spent scores of millions flying hundreds of USAF bombing missions protecting Libyan rebels--Islamic fundamentalists--against government forces, but couldn't spend a dime protecting our own ambassador and his staff, eh?

"Responsibiity to Protect."  Gee, if we had any journalists one of 'em might ask Obozo if R2P is still an active policy of the Obozo administration.

Oh yeah, what was I thinking?