What a firing in Europe means for the U.S.

The creature below is named "Petra de Sutter."  You won't be surprised to learn that a) Petra is not its real name; and b) whoever this really is was a member of the Green partei of Belgium; and c) then became a member of the damn leftist European Parliament.  

 

After those exalted positions, "Petra" was named Deputy Prime Minister for Groen (Flemish green party) as well as Minister for Public Enterprises and Public Administration.  Once that party was out of power, "Petra" won some sort of election as "Rector" of the U. of Ghent.

Clearly "Petra" has lived a charmed life.  The Belgian press is absolutely crammed with fawning, slobbering articles about the creature's faaaabulousness.  But something seemed a bit...off, so I checked Wiki.  (I know.)

The Wiki piece was as fawning as the Belgian press, swooning over all of "Petra's" faaabulous positions.  Wiki predictably only failed to mention one small thing--and you obviously already guessed: "Petra" isn't a woman.  And "Petra" isn't really its name. 

Question is, why didn't Wiki mention this.  Try asking the communist sons of bitches.  Good luck.

So why would I take my precious damn time to introduce you to this mentally ill (but clearly "connected" twit?  Because unbelievable as it may seem, this "twit" has just defined a pivotal point for our society.  (Democrats: "You idiot, Petra isn't an American, so how can she [sic] have any possible relevance to U.S. society?  You're stupid...and deplorable!")

I'll explain: "Petra" and the Left demand that we all unquestioningly accept the claim of trannies and their Leftist supporters that "trans women ARE women."  And the entire Democrat-fellating, Lying Mainstream Media eagerly parrot that lie.  For example, the fawning, slobbering Wiki propaganda piece never mentions that "Petra" is a biological male claiming to be female.  There's even a piece in the Belgian press blasting some TV interviewer for even asking duh faaaabulous "Petra" "When someone asks about your 'dead name,' does that hurt you?"

"Just NOT DONE," huffed the press.  Cuz by even alluding to the tranny's real sex, you expose the lie, and that's just...well in Europe you can be imprisoned for that.

When your 5-year-old kid claims he's a dinosaur, that's amusing, and you can indulge that fantasy with no harm.  Or you could gently tell him that claiming he's something unreal doesn't make it true, eh?  The difference is that your 5-year-old can't throw you in prison if you don't eagerly agree that he IS a dinosaur.  

By sharp contrast, trannies and their Leftist enablers have already passed laws giving them the power to throw YOU in prison if you deny their clearly unreal bleat that "trans women ARE women."

So far that's only happened in Europe and the U.K, but it's coming here fast. 

If you don't believe that (and you don't), consider this: ten days ago a mom and teen daughter were at a WNBA game, wearing T-shirts saying simply "XX is not XY."  Anything obscene there?  Of course not.  But arena staff ordered them to cover up what the staff called an "offensive message."  Wait, how was it offensive?  And to whom?

Sure: XX and XY refer to chromosomes, and are a way of saying men are not women.  So why would anyone be offended by this obvious truth (well, obvious to most rational adults)?  And in any event, since the message was obviously not obscene, by what alleged "right" did the WNBE order that they cover up?  Thought we had free speech (if not obscene), eh?

And why the hell would the "W" NBA be terminally upset by the obvious truth that men are not women? 

If you pay attention, you know why: one gal with courage.  Sophie Cunningham, a star WNBA player.  Remember the controversy she ignited?  She had the audacity to say biological men shouldn't compete against women.  Remember?

Not too long ago, that notion was so obvious and non-controversial that no one even bothered to say it.  But then leftists (yes) realized they could utterly fuck up the country NOT just by people changing sex (yeah, I know, "gender"), but by forcing all of us to agree with the lie that men who claim to be female really are.  And that if you deny that, you're somehow bad. 

Then within a couple of years, corrupt, glib shitheads like Gavin Newsom and Barky Obozo were forcing taxpayers to pay for sex-change operations for inmates, then for illegal aliens.  Democrat-ruled states passed LAWS allowing the state to take a child away from a parent who refused to eagerly embrace the lie, as by calling the child by their given name instead of their "dead name."  Ohhh the HORROR!  The states called it "child abuse."  Seriously.

If you get all your "newz" from the lying, Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media you don't believe a word of that last paragraph.  But every word is true.  It all happened so gradually, with the full support of the Mainstream Media and all Dem pols, that only a few people noticed.  And their voices were silenced. 

So back to "Petra:"  Right now in the U.S. you can't be imprisoned for saying men can't become real women by merely claiming so.  In that case, why do I claim "Petra" represents a "pivot point" for our society?  

Because crazy leftist Democrats are about to regain power here.  Which means leftists will be able to pass any law they want.  And one of the first ones (after "free" medical care, housing, food and college for all, abolish ICE, cops and prisons, free childcare and reparations) will be to make saying or even implying that "men can't be women" "hate speech," punishable by prison.

Of course you don't believe that's remotely possible, cuz you think the First Amendment guarantees the right of free speech.  After all, the Supreme Court says even burning the American flag is protected by free speech, so how could uttering an absolute truth put someone in prison?

Answer: the Supreme Court long ago ruled that not all speech is "protected."  Meaning if "duh gruberment" doesn't like X, yew cain't say it.  And gradually, as our courts were taken over by leftist judges, hundreds of lawsuits ruled that wearing a T-shirt saying "Fuck [whatever]," or burning the flag, or nude dancing, were all "protected speech." 

But that can also work the other direction: Leftist judges will absolutely uphold any law that says you can be imprisoned for saying "men aren't women."  

Oh, you think that's ridiculous?  I'll be that until ten minutes ago not one of you would have bet that a mom and daughter could legally be thrown out of an arena for wearing shirts saying simply "XX is not XY," eh?

Be honest: you never believed that could happen, cuz an absolute truth and not obscene.

Obviously that's a long way from being imprisoned--but the point is that there are NO barriers to congress passing such a law.  Trump obviously would veto it, but after 2028 the Dem prezzy will absolutely sign it into law.

The fatal flaw of democracy is that when the crazies outnumber the sane, it's all over.  In our case the DSA communists are forcing "normal" Democrat pols to embrace their insane policies to be re-elected (THE obvious goal of every politician).  So it's not that the U.S. has more trannies than cis people, but that if the Left has a majority, they can do whatever they want--there is NO remaining barrier, because the courts have ruled that certain "speech" is criminal.  

I don't have any problem if someone claims to be Napoleon, or a dinosaur, or the opposite sex.  The problem all of us should have is when "woke" politicians, pandering for votes, pass laws establishing "Human Rights Commissions" and give 'em the power to sue you and fine you for disagreeing with the crazies.  Or to fire you.  Yeah, that's one helluva red line for me.

So why is "Petra" relevant here?  Because in the U.K the gullible dipshits at Cambridge had appointed a young mentally ill black male as "the youngest black professor in the university's history."  Problem was, not a word of his resume was true.  His dissertation was plagiarized, even copying erroneous punctuation marks.  He claimed to have run 30 marathons in 35 days, and 300 miles in 3 days.  Claimed to have raised 5 million pounds for charities, but later said this was part of a team effort.  When asked who the other team members were, he said he was prevented from saying due to signing NDAs.

Every question about a tall tale had an equally unbelievable response.  And he did it all seemingly effortlessly.

He claimed someone had left a pig's head on his porch.  He said he complained to the cops and that they investigated and found one butcher who had sold a whole pig on the morning in question.  But the cops said there was no investigation, and the butcher said the cops never came to his shop to inquire.  Arday was simply accustomed to never being questioned, nor to have anyone try to verify his bullshit stories.  

So...his field was "sociology of education."  Now I'm convinced that all "doctors of education" are phonies, and same for most of sociology.  Put both together and I suspect it pegs the bullshit meter.  That seems to have been Arday's main skill.  

So a researcher at U. Ghent--Cofnas--did put Arday's dissertation thru plagiarism-detecting software.  Bingo.  And then lots more followed.  Cofnas went public, and Cambridge screamed bloody murder.  "How DARE you!! It's UNFAIR to question duh masterful research of dis faaaabulous young academic!  Din' yew see he iz duh youngest black professor EVAH at Cambridge?  You can't possibly believe dat all duh distinguished, brilliant PhDs in charge of hiring new profs would have missed all dis evidence if it was real, right?  So since that's not possible, you must be lying!  And no, we don't need to actually examine your so-called 'evidence' cuz we already know we're right and you're a raaaaaaaccist!"

Now at last we come to "Petra"--didn't work at Cambridge, and not even in the UK, but in effing Belgium.  "Petra"--who should be very good at identifying fakes, eh?--used its power as "Rector" at the U to fire Cofnas for "harassing the youngest black professor in Cambridge's history" at a totally different university not even in Belgium.

See, according to "wokie" rules no one in academia is allowed to even discover--let alone reveal--that a PhD committed academic fraud.  Well, at least if the fraudster is black.  Whites, of course, are still fair game.  Gee, why are we not surprised?

And the hoot is the number of commenters on X who snarled that the investigator, Cofnas, was a bad person for exposing the total fraud Arday.  Wow.

It's coming here.  In fact it already IS here.  It's just that now all the left can do is fire you, not prison.

Not quite yet.