My prediction: It's too late. Dem socialists will win in November--by lying

Hasan Piker--advisor to dozens of DSA communists--is the closest creature to satan that I've ever seen.  Here he explains the importance of DSA candidates lying to voters:

"Our politicians, whether AOC or anybody else, are NOT running away from progress.  So their pragmatism isn't to moderate their policies but to moderate their comms, their communication."

If you didn't get that, read it again.  Piker is saying "his" candidates are NOT changing their positions to get elected, but instead are merely being "pragmatic" by claiming they no longer support communist policies.  And that's exactly what you're seeing. 

Piker admits Muslim communist Abdul El-Sayed's true beliefs are "electoral poison," then tells his minions how to fix that: "You got to moderate your message, even if you don't want to temper your movement, in order to sell it to the public."

"Moderate your message even if you don't 'temper' your movement" is commie-babble for not being honest about their communist policies--things they've openly pushed before but now are seeming to re-think.  But it's horseshit.

You may have seen that surveys of Democrat voters show about 60% have a favorable view of socialism and a negative view of capitalism.  And white women with a college degree favor socialism even more--over 70%, with about the same percentage saying they dislike capitalism.

Clearly these women have never lived under socialism.  Instead they've simply swallowed the communist propaganda, like "In Cuba and Europe, health-care is absolutely free, and faaaabulous!  Same for housing, and food!"

So health-care is free, eh?  Only if you can get it.  In Canada and the UK it's normal to have to wait six months to get an MRI.  Rather than waiting, Canuks who fear they may have cancer come to the U.S. and pay cash to get an MRI in a day or two.  Nowhere in the rest of the world can you get that--unless you're "connected," part of the ruling party. 

Of course American liberals never heard about that, and wouldn't believe it if a Canadian or a Brit told 'em.  Stupid liberals--men as well as women--totally buy the lie that healthcare in the socialist world is faaaabulous--because it's "free."

But obviously it is NOT free.  Nothing is free but the air you breathe, and sunshine.  Your taxes pay for everything the government supposedly "gives" citizens.  And if you don't understand that (and liberals absolutely don't) you're too fucking stupid to breathe.

Stupid liberals are on the verge of handing over control of the entire U.S. government to socialists.  And if you know history of other countries (spoiler: you don't), you know they'll never relinquish that power.

Of course you don't believe that cuz you're smaaaht, right?  You know control of our government has bounced back and forth, so it's absurd to think that would end, eh?

That's because you naively think communists actually support democracy--because they endlessly bleat that they do, eh?  Well look at Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Spain: You can vote communism in, but can't vote it out.  The Party changes the constitution so the president can serve as long as he wants.  The Party rigs elections because The Party counts the votes.  (Sound familiar?)  The Party appoints all the judges.  Only Party members get hired as university professors, ensuring that all college grads only hear how totally wonderful socialism/communism is.  (We've been there for decades.)

When there are shortages "It's not the Party's fault, comrade!  It's doze eeebil American capitalists preventing us from trading!"  In the case of Cuba they call it a "blockade," but the truth is that even friendly communist countries will no longer GIVE fellow socialists nations billions of dollars of food or medicine.  The USSR did that for decades with Cuba and finally said "enough."  

Wait, we were always told that all socialists were big on "solidarity" with fellow socialist nations!  Guess that was also horseshit. 

SO...what does this all mean for the U.S. just 80 days from now, eh?  To understand it you have to know military history.  (Spoiler: you don't.)

One of the areas where Trump has NO knowledge or expertise is military conflict.  He stupidly believes the leaders of Iran would realize they were totally out-gunned and would surrender, to be able to regain the ability to sell the $400 MILLION worth of oil they sold to the world every DAY.  And from Trump's limited perspective, that makes perfect sense.

But the Muzz leaders of Iran refused, because they knew they could claim they had defeated the U.S. (which they claim every day, if you care to watch), and could string Trump along with bullshit negotiations until the mid-terms.  They knew that if they could con Trump into NOT bombing 'em into oblivion til then, the Democrat party would use the power of the purse to force the U.S. to end all operations in the region and withdraw all forces.  The world will understandably see that as surrender, and the loss of face to the U.S. will be devastating.

More crucial: Iran will be free to build the atomic bombs they've been working on for years.  They admitted to having roughly a thousand pounds of 60%-enriched uranium, enough for about 20 atomic bombs.

After the first time Iran's leaders bleated "We have defeated the U.S." Trump could have ended that bullshit by ordering our Air Force to bomb them until nothing remained--as we did to win WW2.  But he naively believed they'd opt for a negotiated settlement, since it would obviously be far less destructive.  Very logical.  But Iran's rulers didn't care.

Now, with just 80 days left, Iran's leaders know they've won: Trump no longer has the option to bomb 'em into oblivion, simply because doing that so close to the election would make it seem that he was doing it to save congressional seats for the GOP.  And the Mainstream Media would eagerly, endlessly bleat that this was the only reason.

SO...with Iran still bragging that they've defeated the U.S., conservative voters will be demoralized and will stay home, while U.S. leftists will turn out in record numbers to seize control of congress.  In fact I predict we'll see dozens of Dem precincts reporting more ballots cast than eligible voters, just as in 2020.  But no judge will hear the case, and there won't be time to investigate before the new congress is sworn in.

Skeptical Repub voter: "Nah, we'll still be fine cuz only 60% of Democrats will vote for socialists!"

No, you're naive: Dems will vote for the Democrat candidate, even if communist--cuz in the last few weeks before the election the Dem-fellating Mainstream Media will show endless video of all the communist candidates sounding EVER so moderate and reasonable.

Their communist DSA candidates won't renounce support for the dozen commie priorities, but will simply say things like "We need to consider abolishing the senate, having Medicare for all, abolishing police and prisons, making college free, forgiving all student loans, allowing unlimited immigration and giving 'em citizenship, ending our use of oil, gas and nuclear power, allowing criminals to be immediately released without having to post bail, de-funding the armed forces, packing the Supreme Court, abolishing the Electoral College and replacing it with the winner of the popular vote, and having congress choose ouah president."

"SEE, citizen?  Just consider doze things, right?  Where's the harm in dat?"

So there's my prediction.  And in 80 days or so we should know--though we may have to wait another two weeks for the Dems to inject enough fake ballots into the count.

And the hoot is, almost no one who reads this will believes a word of it.