CNN posts a piece "pre-debunking" Trump's speech for tonight

Trump is slated to give a speech tonight, and the betting is that it will involve massive election fraud by Democrats in 2020.  SO...CNN has already written the "pre-bunking" article:

President Donald Trump is expected to use his televised address Thursday to press what he will frame as new information on foreign efforts to influence US elections – the latest in what election observers have warned is a campaign to sow mistrust and try to undercut [?] his 2020 loss.  
   Trump has faced criticism for seeking to undermine faith in elections and denying results, and state elections officials told CNN they are watching closely, fearful he might use the prime-time speech to do so again. 
   The US intelligence community released a report assessing that the Russian government meddled with an influence campaign “denigrating” President Joe Biden and “supporting” Trump.
  Some say worry that Trump might sow doubt about future elections. [sic; either "say" or "worry" shouldn't be there]

Ohh, absolutely, morons: Given a choice between "denigrating" either Trump or bribem--meaning tacitly supporting the other--CNN wants you to believe Putin would rather support America-first Trump instead of the known bribe-taker bribem?

It is to laugh.  Utterly absurd horseshit.  Ask your Dem friends who is more pro-military, pro-America, Trump or bribem?  Then after they say Trump, ask which one Putin and Xi would rather have running the U.S.  Easy answer, but too hard for Democrats.

The secretary of state for the Democrat-ruled shithole state of Washington, Steve Hobbs, told CNN. “We can assume that he’s gonna say crazy things.”  

Oh, y'mean like claiming tens of thousands of fake ballots were counted?

Y'mean like claiming tens of thousands of mail-in ballots were counted that didn't have signatures matching those on file?  Or any sigs at ALL?  Those kinds of fraud?  Cuz we wouldn't want Americans to think there was any fraud in ouah presidential and congressional elections, right?

Iowa's secretary of state told CNN he hoped to tune out the speech.

The next Dem counter-move will be to bleat that IF there wuz any election fraud, it wuz done by the eeeebil Rethuglicans, by "suppressing minority votes!"  Yep yep yep!  See, actual U.S. citizens who weren't white were skeered into NOT dropping their ballot into a mailbox!  Cuz duh Rethuglican KKK might see 'em!

Not the real KKK, of course, which was founded and composed of Democrats.  Dat KKK is long gone, citizen, an' haz been replaced by  Rethuglicans!  The SPLC haz all duh proof!

Srsly y'all.  Look at the hundreds of sworn affidavits from 2020 alleging Rethuglican vote fraud!  Oh wait, there aren't any.  "Oh but there must have been!  Doze affidavits musta' been seized and shredded by pro-Rethuglican court officials!  Yep yep yep!"

AI sez in the 2008 election, Obozo got 69,498,516 votes, while in 2012 he got 62,611,250 votes.  By contrast, in 2020 bribem was credited with 81,283,000 votes.

For the maff-challenged that would mean bribem got almost 12 MILLION MORE votes than the wildly popular "first black president" got in hiz first election, and a staggering 18.5 MILLION more than barky got in his second election.  But dat perfekly reasonable, deplorable, cuz duh faaabulous Joe was SO much mo' popular den duh first black prezzy, right?  Joe was SO articulate an' smaht, so it totally reasonable dat he got so many mo' votes than barky.  No fraud needed!

In 2020 Trump had dozens of rallies that drew over 50,000 attendees, while bribem stayed in his basement.  When he timidly ventured out, it wasn't to crowds, but to literally 25 friendly Dem reporters who sat inside white circles 8 feet apart (bribem's staff wuz extra-careful).  

Dems claim bribem could have had rallies of 50,000-plus, but just chose not to--cuz he "believed duh Science," eh?

Ah, not to worry, citizen!  Duh Media an' duh Dems haz spoken, an' dey say dere wuz NO fraud in 2020!  So it does NOT mattah whut any investigation may find.  In fact duh Dems have tried to block EVERY investigation seeking to examine ballots for obvious fakes.  

And of course if Democrat pols and election workers had nothing to worry about, why not welcome all investigations, to reassure Americans that there was no fraud, eh?  Cuz now CNN just claimed Trump is trying to "sow doubt about future elections," which wouldn't be possible if the Dems hadn't blocked ALL investigations into fraud after 2020, eh?

Not to worry, comrade deplorable: Logic can't be allowed into this debate.  Dems an' duh Media haz decreed, an' yew will accept dere ruling.

Source: CNN

https://lite.cnn.com/2026/07/16/politics/trump-primetime-election-speech-debate