Did the Dems steal the 2020 election? New evidence

In 2020, bribem was officially deemed to have won Georgia by 11,779 votes.

Georgia was one of the many states where election officials mailed absentee ballots to EVERY registered voter.  Problem is, many of the addressees had moved, so some ballots likely ended up in other hands.

More damning is that many "absentee ballots" that were scanned lacked any creases from folds.  For the terminally stupid, mail-in ballots are sent in envelopes smaller than the ballot, so must be folded to fit in the envelopes.  Same for when they're mailed back--unless they were put in illegal "drop boxes." (Georgia law didn't provide for those, but they somehow appeared all over Democrat cities.)  But even then, the ballots would have been creased to fit in the envelopes when mailed TO registered voters, eh?

Now a court case in Fulton County, GA, claims 150,000 mail-in ballots in that county were likely "fake" because they had no creases.  Also, they didn't appear to have been marked by hand.

By the official count, bribem got over 70 percent of the votes in Fulton county--the first Dem since the hugely more popular Franklin Roosevelt did it in 1944. 

Meanwhile Democrats are blocking all efforts to investigate.  New York congresswhore Dan Goldman has filed an amendment to block the Trump administration from investigating election records, ballot boxes and voting machines in any state in the country. 

In most states, elections are run by the Secretary of State.  In Georgia that's Brad Raffensburger. Cleta Mitchell, who advised President Trump when he contested the Georgia election results, noted that on the morning of election day, 2020, Raffensperger announced that Trump was ahead by 103,000 votes with only 94,000 ballots left to count.  And since his job was to run the election, you'd think he'd know.  

Yet somehow, four days after declaring that only 94,000 ballots remained to be counted, Raffensberger NOW claimed there were over 300,000 more ballots to count--including 148,000 absentee ballots from Fulton County alone. Hmm...

Investigators found that over 133,000 ballot images--which by law had to be saved--had been deleted.  NONE of 148 Fulton County tabulators had the required verification tapes.  Nearly 7,000 fake ballots were accepted as genuine, and Fulton County election officials just smiled.

Finally: According to Grand Jury testimony just unsealed, Kemp told the chief of Georgia Bureau of Investigation not to investigate allegations of fraud in the 2020 election.  Saying he was a "team player," the chief of the GBI stopped investigating.

Now: bribem officially won the 2020 election by 306 to 232 electoral votes--a margin of 74, so a swing of 37 would have tied the election, and 38 would have reversed the result.  Georgia has 16 electoral votes, so putting just that state into the Trump column obviously wouldn't be enough to change the result.  

But in four other states--Arizona, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, with elections run by Democrats, bribem's alleged margin of victory was so close that it could easily have been due to fraud.  Here's the official margin for bribem in each:
                       margin         EVs
   Arizona         10,500         11 
   Georgia        11,779         16 
   Wisconsin     20,682         10
   Nevada         33,000          6
   Pennsylvania 81,660        20 

As the investigation into Georgia's results shows, all these margins are well within the likely number of fraudulent votes in Fulton County, Georgia alone. 

Recall that moving 37 electoral votes into Trump's column would have produced a tie (sending the decision to the House), while 38 would have reversed the outome.  The top three states above, alone, would change 37 EVs.  So the question is, is it *plausible* for the Dems to have created enough fake votes to match the totals for the first 3 states above. 

The Lying Mainstream Media has constantly bleated that in every case where the GOP sued for election fraud in the 2020 election, judges heard all the evidence and ruled against the GOP.  That's horseshit--a flat, blatant, brazen lie.  The truth is that 99% of the lawsuits filed were dismissed by leftist judges on the grounds that the judges RULED that the plaintiffs lacked "standing"--a recognizable legal interest--to sue for election fraud.

This is absurd: If a candidate can't sue for obvious vote fraud, *no one could.*  Yet the Democrat-fellating Mainstream Media always bleated that judges had examined all these facts and allegations and found them meritless. 

That's a brazen lie.  Leftist judges dismissed all the lawsuits without ever examining the allegations, on the grounds of alleged "lack of legal standing to sue" or similar bullshit.

Then three weeks ago a funny thing happened: the Supreme Court ruled (7-2) that candidates in elections DO have legal standing to sue for fraud--
like absentee ballots either not having required signatures, or those signatures not being checked to see if they matched the sig on file; or signatures clearly NOT matching the one on file--indicating fraud.

(If you're curious, the two dissenting votes were from bribem-appointed moron Katanji Brown-Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor (who proclaimed herself a "wise Latina.")

So at least the next time the Democrats try to steal a presidential election, the SC has ruled that the conservative candidate can sue.