Huge "climate change" pusher Bill Gates changes his tactics

Bill Gates may be the second-most overrated person on the planet (the first being Obozo)

For years Gates has been wailing that Global Worming--excuse me: "climate change"--was gonna wipe out life on Erf.  Gates even funded a proposal to use jumbo jets at max altitude to spew a million tons of calcium carbonate dust (limestone dust) into the stratosphere to reflect a percent or two of sunlight back into space instead of allowing it to reach duh Erf's surface.  Seriously, he funded these studies.

But that was yesterday, eh?  Now Bill seems to have decided that climate change is NOT gonna kill life on Erf after all!

Wow, such a TOTAL change!  Say, Bill, what new info led ya to dis new conclusion that's totally opposite to what you used to spout?

Be specific: what new info have you suddenly learned?

I'd love to know, but no so-called "reporter" will ever ask--because there isn't any new info.  Gates just decided "the rubes" (that's us)--or as the leftists call us: "climate deniers" (clever Demo-babble)--had about had enough of the Leftist horseshit that a) the Erf was warming at a scary rate; b) that this was being caused by CO2; and c) that the people to blamed were NOT Chinese or Indian, but Americans.

Yep yep yep.  Other nations can do whatever dey want, but you Americans--"climate deniers"--have to buy electric cars and stop heating your homes with less-costly natural gas. 

So Billy deftly switches his horseshit tune.  And every mainstream reporter knows not to ask the reason ("What new information have you gotten..."), since they know if they do, they won't get invited to the next Dem shindig in Aspen or Davos! 

In fairness, the Associated (Communist) Press explains that Gates is just changing where he wants to spend his money, from spreading dust in the atomosphere and bitching about CO2 emissions (which don't do anything unusual) to "preventing suffering for those in the toughest conditions in the world's poorest countries."

Deep in the Associated Press article is this: "The Gates foundation provides financial support for Associated Press coverage of health and development in Africa."  Say, ya think it's a coincidence that the AP's coverage of "health and development in Africa" is always fawning?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/28/climate/bill-gates-climate-change-humanity.html