What Tuesday's election tells us

First: Both Virginia and NJ are heavily majority-Democrat states, so Democrat wins there aren't surprising.  But the shocker is how large the margins of the Dem win were:

• In heavily Democrat New Jersey, Democrats won by 14% for governor;
• In heavily Democrat Virginia, Dems won by 13% for governor;
• Moronic, amoral Virginia Democrats even managed to elect as their state's attorney-general a man who posted on social media that he wanted to "put two bullets in the head" of the Republican who was then speaker of the Virginia legislature--and added that he wanted to see the man's children die in their mother's arms.  This should give you an idea of the depth of the moral abyss Democrats inhabit today.
• In Arizona, Democrats voters (likely with the help of tens of thousands of illegal votes from non-citizens) won a special election for an Arizona House seat--by 40%.
• In heavily-Democrat Virginia Dems won a special election for a Virginia House seat--by 48%.
• New York City is hugely majority Democrat, so electing a Dem mayor is no surprise.  What IS stunning is that the dumb bastards elected an openly communist Muslim--who's never held a real job--as mayor.  That's a HUGE telltale for the future.  

Democrat pols and the Dem-fellating Mainstream Media were understandably gloating, gleeful.

So what do those results tell us?

The obvious one is that Democrat voters are so dumb that even rocks are laughing at 'em.  But by huge contrast, Dem politicians are cunning and brilliant--in the same way a serial rapist who manages to have eluded capture is brilliant:  They've managed to make their voters willing to riot to block efforts to enforce U.S. immigration law.

Let that sink in for a minute.

Democrat politicians have succeeded in getting their street thugs to block efforts to enforce U.S. laws.  Think about the Rubicon Democrat "leaders" (i.e. scum-sucking communist rat-bastard child rapists) just urged 'em to cross.

(For young Americans: Ask your parents if they know the significance of "crossing the Rubicon."  If they're liberal Democrats, chances are they won't know.)

The Democrat plan was (is) to to demonize the men whose job is to try to enforce U.S. law--and Dem pols have turned that into a cause, with lots of screaming Latino women and rock-throwing males, which makes GREAT video for the alphabet nets, eh?

There's an old saying in the Media: "If it bleeds, it leads."  Stories that feature rock-throwing mobs lead every "newzcast," and the message is always exactly the same: "Trump is acting like a dictator!  Orange Hitler!  Acting like a king!  Tryin' t' deport deez wunnerful pipo who haz nevah broken no laws at ALL, citizen!  Nope nope nope!"

"Enforcing valid U.S. law" is never mentioned.  Instead it's "Trump is a dictator!!!"

If you wanna see Democrat "logic" at work, watch the vid of that true bird-brain Jasmine Crockett bleating "Breaking the law doesn't make someone a criminal!"  Yes, she actually said that.  On video.

And amazingly (and predictably) Jazzy, like AOC and Hakeem Jeffries, is the true face of the New Democrat Party.

Now: It's hard to blame people with an IQ of 80 and under for voting for the candidate that promises to "gibs 'em mo' free sheeit," eh?  If socialist/communist/Democrat pols--not just Momdani but ALL Democrat politicians--promise to give voters "free shit" (question: is it really "free"?), it should be obvious that dumb voters will vote for 'em.  Long-term disaster is never considered. 

Now: Unless you've spent lots of time walking around a big Dem-ruled city (you probably haven't) you can't really appreciate how many truly stupid people (or perhaps merely uneducated people) live there.  These are people who have no idea what the three branches of government are, or how many U.S. senators, or how many judges are on the Supreme Court, or who fought in the Revolutionary War.

They're people who read at a 4th-grade level, meaning they try to avoid reading.  They get their "newz" from TV, and believe everything MS-WTF bleats.

And because of the vastly higher birthrate of illegal immigrants, low-info Dem voters will keep breeding low-info, Democrat-voting kids--almost three times more than educated women of European descent have.  Because of this, the Democrat-voting percentage of the population will continually increase.  They already control virtually every big city and have a huge  majority in shithole blue states like Virginia, New Jersey, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, Colorado, Oregon, Washington and California.

A hallmark of smarter people is that they're able to predict the likely consequences of current actions--specifically consequences of dumb Democrat policies.

By contrast, dumb people--the Democrats' voting base--can't do that.  Try this thought experiment: Suppose a Democrat pol promises that if elected he'll give every Democrat a free Cadillac.  How many dumbshits will think "Whoa!  The cost will be staggering!  That's likely to vastly increase the national debt, meaning the gummint will have to pay more interest to service that debt, meaning..."

Of course not.  The typical low-info voter never thinks past "I'll take it!" 

"Wait...whut dis sheeit 'bout 'insurance'?  Y'say I gots t'get insurance t' register duh free Caddy?  An' dat in NYC or Jersey dat'll cost me $4,000 a YEAR?  Nah, bro, yew gots t'gimmeedat free too!"

So here we are:  The communist Muzz mayor of NYC promised free shit to everyone if they voted for him.  And they did.  And he'll be able to impose a special city tax on NYC corporations and "the rich," without having to get permission from Kathy's Democrat state government.  And with that much extra money he'll be able to keep things going for his 4-year term.  

He'll easily win re-election, and then reality will start to kick in.  But by that time the Democrats will control both chambers of congress, and the Dems will give Mamdani all the cash he needs to keep his socialist regime working.
 
====
Lessons from the election, part 2:
   One of the ways to see what Americans are thinking is reading comments on popular websites.  And after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, leftists and Democrats swamped comment sections even on conservative websites, cheering, sneering that Kirk deserved it.
  If anyone doubted that the Democrat party was insane, that should have confirmed it.  Imagine how warped, how demonic someone has to be to cheer an assassination.  This is the stuff of Mexican politics, where candidates who don't support the cartels are routinely assassinated. 

===
Lessons from the election, part 3:
   In every election there are tens of thousands of fraudulent votes.  Some of these are due to fraudsters voting in person in two different precincts, while others are due to fraud in mail-in ballots.

In Maine, 173,000 citizens were concerned enough about vote fraud to put a measure on the ballot to do two things: require photo ID to vote in person, and to reduce fraud in mail-in ballots.

That measure was defeated 64% to 36%.  What that tells us is that either stupid Dem voters in Maine simply don't believe there's vote fraud, or that they don't care.  And I'll go either way on that.  

Who would either want, or want to tolerate, vote fraud?  Democrats and illegal immigrants, because it helps 'em win elections.  And since Maine is a Dem-ruled state, there was virtually no chance of the measure passing.  The surprise is the margin by which the measure was defeated:

In Maine, 33% of voters are registered Democrats, 29% are Republicans and 34% are "unaffiliated."  So you'd think the measure would have failed by about 50 to 46 or so, instead of 64-36.  So what happened?

Democrats long ago discovered that the surest way to win votes to pass a new government freebie (Dem-run boondoggle) was to describe it as "your right."  Before about 1970 anyone who claimed "you have a right to demand that taxpayers give you housing or food or medical care or internet service would have been laughed out of town.
   But somewhere between 1965 (Lyndon Johnson's great giveaway) and 1968, a newspaper in California got a welfare recipient to sue the state demanding that people on welfare had the absolute right to get a "free" newspaper every day--at taxpayer expense, of course.
   The argument used by the Democrat grifters was that "well informed" citizens would vote more rationally.   And since it was automatically assumed that newspapers told the truth, nothing else needed to be said.

The real goal, of course, was to get the court to order the Democrat government of the state to use taxpayer funds to give 100,000 more copies of the state's leading newspaper to welfare recipients.  So more income for the newspaper, eh? And you won't be surprised to learn that the leftist judge agreed.

Conversely, Dems discovered that the way to defeat a measure they didn't like was to use the papers and TV stations to bleat "Republicans are trying to take away your rights!"

Obvious, and brilliant.  See, it didn't matter if either claim ("It's your RIGHT to have..." or "They're trying to take away your rights") was true.  All that mattered to low-info voters was that they'd heard it, so they believed it.

So in Maine the rat-bastard Democrats used the newspapers and TV stations to bleat that the two ballot measures to reduce vote fraud were "taking away your right to VOTE," and "an attempt at voter suppression."  They wailed that requiring photo-ID would "disenfranchise voters who are less likely to have a driver's license, such as the elderly, minorities and disabled.

Of course people who don't drive can get a "state-issued non-driver photo ID" for free.  But Maine's "public-radio website" cunningly omitted that detail, eh?  Cuz including it would have shown that the claim of "voter suppression" was a lie.

On the provisions that would have reduced fraud in absentee voting, supporters of the ballot measure wanted the state to end its Dem-ruled policy of automatically mailing absentee ballots to "some" voters, since if the voter moved, those ballots always ended up in someone else's hands.  Supporters also wanted to end the state policy of allowing people to request an absentee ballot by phone, since there was no way to verify that the caller was who he or she claimed to be.

(For morons: the precinct doesn't know your Social Security number, so that's out.  There's no way to verify.)

Thirty groups joined to defeat the measure: national as well as state labor unions provided most of the money [why would national unions care about Maine, eh?  Oh yeah: more Democrats in congress], along with the Democrat-fellating ACLU, the Democrat-fellating League of Women Voters, and--strangely--a group called "Maine Conservation Voters."  These well-funded groups out-spent those supporting anti-fraud measures by more than two to one.  All Democrat pols were against the fraud-reduction measure.

SO...what have we learned today, kids?

Democrats: "Nuffin', cuz dis wuz all FAKE NEWZ!  Nunna dis evah happen!  We Dems iz jus' try'na prevent 'voter suppression' by Orange Hitler!  Yep yep yep!"