Leftists outraged! over ABC's decision to pull Kimmel over his claim that Kirk's assassin was MAGA

You have no idea.

Really.  You think the Mainstream Media is at least roughly honest and fair, and tells you at least some rough approximation of the truth.  But it's not even close:  Almost without exception all TV networks, big-city newspapers and the "entertainment industry" (movies, shows) feed you a carefully-crafted leftist Narrative--i.e. lies (which just happen to help the Democrat Partei [sic]).
 
But since most Americans never see or read any contradictory information, you have no way of knowing what you're seeing and hearing is horseshit--which is what allows the Left to effectively run the country even when a Republican is president.  They can portray a cold-blooded assassin as a love-struck kid--a touching Romeo defending his Juliet--knowing that most Americans will believe their Narrative.

After Charlie Kirk's assassination the Left/Democrats rejoiced.  Go to any "political" website and read the thousands of ghastly, ghoulish comments.  They were absolutely overcome with joy.

But then when ABC dropped Kimmel (at least until the outrage diminishes), ALL the leftist Mainstream Media outlets were HORRIFIED!  The fat potato Stelter on CNN was typical, saying dropping Kimmel "makes America a less free place."  Other Mainstream voices jumped in: "Jimmy didn't even say anything that bad--but even if he had, that's freedom of speech."

Average stupid 20-year-old Democrat: "YEAH!!!  Cuz duh First Amendment sez pipo kin say anything we want wifout consequence!  Yep yep yep!"

No, you dumb son of a bitch, it doesn't--which you would have known if you'd ever actually READ the thing.  But of course you haven't, since most public schools deliberately stopped teaching students about the Constitution around 1970.  

The First Amendment says "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech..."

On his nationally-televised show Monday, Kimmel said this:
>>[T]he MAGA gang [is] desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of their own...>>

Didja catch that?  Kimmel was clearly implying (though prudently not explicitly stating) that the assassin was a MAGA supporter.  And then he explicitly states that "the MAGA gang [is] desperately trying" to portray the assassin "as anything other than one of their own," again leading viewers to believe the assassin was a conservative and that "the MAGA gang" knows it!

All brazen lies.  But stupid Democrats believe Kimmel has the absolute right to say anything he wants on "the public airwaves" without consequence.

To re-state:  The First Amendment does NOT prevent companies from firing any pig-headed shithead employee who spews inflammatory lies on their programs (or on social media).  Doesn't violate the First Amendment at all.  Not even close.

Yet we see stupid left-wing actors like Ben Stiller tweeting "This isn't right."  He doesn't mean the assassination, but ABC pulling Kimmel's shitshow.

MSNBC host Chris Hayes:  "This is the most straightforward attack on free speech from state actors I've ever seen in my life."  Not calling the assassination an "attack on free speech."  Ohhh no.

The next Dem nominee for president, Gavin Newsom, claimed "They are censoring you."  No, ya corrupt bastard, Americans are free to say anything, they're just not immune from being fired for doing so.  Newsom knows the difference but implies it's government censorship because that inflames his supporters.

He added "Firing commentators. Canceling shows. These aren't coincidences. It's coordinated. And it's dangerous."

Actually, Gavin, the dangerous thing is that thanks to lies like yours, virtually EVERY Democrat believes a company is barred by the Constitution from firing an employee for uttering or writing brazen lies.

Source.

https://archive.is/4swXA