Unbelievable: biden's DOJ drops charges against Bankman-Fried for "campaign finance violations"

Hey citizen, remember multi-billion-dollar crypto-currency swindler Sam Bankman-Fried?  His first trial, for fraud, ended in a conviction.  Now he was facing a second trial, this one for...um...campaign finance violations and bribery.

But today--Friday, news dump day--bidumb's "Justice Department" announced it's dropping the charges.

Specifically, biden's DOJ lackeys handed the judge a note saying the government "will not pursue a second trial" against Bankman-Fried.

Of course dropping charges for something that serious would require a really good reason, right?  So what do ya think it was?

In the note to Judge Lewis Kaplan, Garland's DOJ lackeys said the decision to "forego a second set of proceedings" [i.e. to DROP the damn charges!] "had to do with" the fact that "much of the evidence that would have been presented in a second trial had already been submitted to the Court during Bankman-Fried's first criminal trial."

Wait, can anyone explain why the hell that's any kind of reason to drop charges against a defendant?

Ohhh, now I get it:  recall that this second trial was for the charge of "campaign finance violations and bribery."  Bankman-Fried donated literally tens of millions to Democrats (and a few RINOs), so it's no surprise that the Dems didn't want all those details coming out just seven months before the presidential election.

To repeat: the utterly corrupt, totally politicized DO"J" claimed reason for dropping the charges--stated in writing by the DOJ-- was reportedly that "Much of the evidence in a second trial had already been submitted in the first trial."  Let's see if that's even remotely true, eh?

You won't be surprised to learn that NONE of the evidence in the first trial dealt with violations of campaign finance laws, nor bribery.  So the purported "reason" for dropping the charges is utter horseshit.

Have you ever heard of a prosecutor dropping charges for such a nonsensical bullshit reason?  The corruption is breathtaking.

The DOJ lackeys had to state some reason, had to say something, or else the corruption would be too obvious.

The BBC found a DOJ lackey who didn't have the same approved script, and said this:

Wait...I thought the first excuse was that "much of the evidence in a second trial had already been presented in the first trial, so..."  But that's not even remotely the same as "a strong public interest in resolution of the case.." eh?  Clearly, they're lying.

And equally clearly, no one gives a damn.  Not one person in a million even noticed that neither of the explanations made sense, or that they were different.  And the Mainstream Media carefully avoided reporting that the "reasoning" was utter horseshit, and totally nonsensical.

If you have an experienced lawyer friend, ask 'em if either explanation makes sense. 

Just another normal day for the utterly corrupt biden/Dem regime.

Source.

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/12/29/prosecutors-say-they-will-not-pursue-second-bankman-fried-trial.html