A brief summary of the dus-up over the Twatter emails
A few of you may have read something about emails between Twatter "disinformation" czars and various government agencies.
Just kidding: you almost certainly don't have any idea about it, because the Mainstream Media hushed it up. Eh, no matter. Prolly wasn't important, eh? So here's a quick summary:
During the panic over the Chyna virus, thousands of ordinary Americans posted things on Twatter that the regime didn't like. The regime--mainly the FBI, DOJ, DHS and White House--told Twatter everything the regime didn't like was "disinformation" and that removing the posts--and in many cases deleting the user's entire account--was a Good Thing.
And of course Twatter's "disinformation specialists"--all leftists and Dem supporters--totally agreed, and dutifully removed any posts the regime didn't like. Twatter even deleted the accounts of some users entirely--again, at the request of the retime.
Adding insult to injury, when Twatter's censors locked users out of their accounts, instead of Twatter deleting the post (which they aso did), Twatter's thought-police would force users to delete the "offensive" post theselves in order to regain the use of their Twatter account.
That's some real Orwellian-class shit right there, eh?
Users who were forced to delete their own posts, or whose accounts were cancelled altogether by Twatter Nazi's, were understandably outraged, and complained bitterly. Did 'em no good at all, since the regime had essentially ordered the deletions, claiming their posts were "disinformation." .
In other cases Fakebook censors "shadow-banned" users who made posts critical of duh jab or of duh regime. Fakebook also removed hot posts from the "Trending" list to reduce visibility.
So how did "your" Mainstream Media respond to this? First the Media denied any of this was happening: "Dis all just a crazy tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory!"
Finally, after Elon Musk bought Twatter and allowed three solidly leftist journalists to examine internal emails between many regime agencies and the company, the censorship was proven beyond doubt. The journalists testified in congress last week, detailing their findings. The Media was uninterested.
Media elites: "Deez peepo not journalists! So ignore dem! Also, dis 'FAKE NEWZ.' Never happened. And even if it did, it was fine, because a private company can remove whatever it likes. Users have no absolute right to publish on it."
Now, with congressional hearings showing the entire plot, Democrats are mounting a coordinated strategy of attacks and lies to discredit the story and deflect blame from the regime:
- Attack the journalists who have exposed the plot by publishing the emails: "You're not *real* journalists."
- Attack the journalists as GOP partisans or puppets of the eeeevil Nazi Musk--who is beginning to rival Trump as an Orwellian villain.
- Claim Trump did the same thing--despite no evidence of that. Peepo believe it, cuz...Orange Man bad!!!!
- Claim Fox News pushed "election denial." Of course that's not all all relevant to this topic but is a great distraction, trying to change the subject away from the regime's censorship scheme;
- Finally if all else fails, return to claiming it didn't happen, or that if it did, it was fine.
Dems are throwing word-salad at the wall and hoping something sticks. And because the Media are barely taking note, most Americans don't know a thing about any of this.
Everyone in any govenrment agency who was involved in this should be fired, lose their pensions, and never be allowed to serve in government again.
But of course we know that won't happen. A corrupt judicial system, the Deep State and Democrat-fellating media ensure that the only government officials ever punished are Republicans. Corrupt Dems are never even charged.
With vanishingly few exceptions, today's Dem pols...
- don't believe the Constitution is or should be the "supreme law of the land"';
- believe the bidens did NOT accept money from China;
- don't believe in freedom of speech, even though they bleat that they really, truly support it;
- believe school administrators know better than parents what's good for the parents' own kids;
- believe government should be able to pressure social media giants to censor user posts the government doesn't like;
- believe that doesn't violate the First Amendment because the actual censorship itself isn't being done by the government, but by private companies acting at the "urging" of the government;
- supported biden's ORDER that all Americans take the jab, and the demand of school systems that kids as young as 5 be forced to take the jab;
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home