Best evidence of Dem election fraud, in Maricopa county, Arizona

For those of you who've been too busy raising your kids or fighting with the mask police to have seen the news, the state senate of Arizona ordered an audit of the presidential vote in Maricopa county.

Maricopa county is by far the largest population center in Arizona, and is totally run by Democrats.  The senate ordered a FORENSIC AUDIT of the ballots because there were dozens of REALLY unlikely anomalies on election night and in the days following.  As just one example, one of the network desks called Arizona for Biden with just one percent of the vote counted.  Bit curious, that.

Now, Democrats are bleating that there have been TWO other audits, so this new order is a waste of tax dollars since it duplicates the earlier results.  This is a flat-out lie: the earlier exams were merely re-counts, with no effort made to ascertain whether ballots were duplicates, or fakes.  But since not one American out of a thousand knows the difference, and the Mainstream Media have been careful not to tell anyone the huge difference, the lie seemed plausible--which was the whole point.

So the senate ordered the county "Board of Supervisors" to turn over all ballots, voting machines and servers to the senate for the audit.  Interestingly, the supervisors simply refused, claiming the state legislature didn't have the authority to order a county to do anything.

A judge soon ruled that that theory was horse shit.

Then, mysteriously, the judge who made that rock-solid ruling was forced to recuse himself, after the *national* Democrat party sent a dozen attorneys to Arizona to block the audit.  One of those attorneys--a guy barely out of law school--had been an intern for the Arizona judge.  Wow, what a coincidence, eh?

But unfortunately for the Democrats, the next judge agreed that--surprise!--the state legislature did indeed have the power to audit the claimed result of an election, so the supervisors retaliated with Plan B, telling the senate that it would cost $6 MILLION just to move the vote-tabulating "servers" to the location of the audit.

This was a brazen lie:  The servers fit a cube 4 feet on a side, and each weighs about what a desktop computer weighs.  Two guys with a dolly could move 'em in an hour.  The claimed cost was yet another blocking effort by the Dems.

Then late Thursday night an investigator in Arizona posted a piece saying that just hours before the servers were to be turned over, someone had deleted a folder containing hundreds of "adjudication files" pertaining to the presidential election.

If you don't know what an "adjudication file" is, that's normal.  It's just the key to one of the ways the Democrats stole the election.  Here's how it works, as demonstrated by an honest election worker in a rural Georgia county:

In most voting-machine systems, ballots are inked by voters, then fed into an optical scanner which reads the marks and tabulates the results.  But occasionally--around 8 ballots out of a thousand or so--the scanner can't be sure who a voter voted for in a particular race.  In that case the ballot is automatically put into a file so election workers can look at each ambiguous ballot and try to determine what the voter intended.  That's an "adjudication file."

Reasonable enough.  But test runs on Dominion systems in Georgia proved that a) the system doesn't record the name of the election worker who determined which candidate was credited with the vote on the "uncertain" ballot; and 2) the system didn't limit the number of ballots that could be put in the adjudication file.  

Thus a dishonest election worker could put any number of ballots in the disputed file and tell the system that 99 percent were for his or her party's candidate.

Slick, eh?  And this was demonstrated--recorded on video--before investigators in Georgia.

Now with that as background, here's the news:  Yesterday the head of the Arizona senate (Karen Fann) wrote the head of the Maricopa board of supervisors, noting that the folder containing the "adjudication files" had been deleted.  Assuming the head of the senate had verified that claim, her letter takes the event out of the "just a rumor" category.

Assuming the folder was in fact deleted is the best evidence that the Democrats are trying to cover up their fraud.  If not, why would they go to the trouble of deleting the folder?

In other words, the fact that they allegedly DID delete the folder is the strongest evidence that there was fraud in Arizona.  Since Biden's total claimed votes was only greater than Trump's by 11,300 or so, just a small amount of fraud would have swung the state to the Dem column.

Of course you know what the outcome will be:  The head of the board will simply deny any knowledge of who deleted the folder, and in fact is likely to claim that an agent of the senate or of the auditing firm was responsible.  This can be disproven by finding the date and time the "delete" command was made.  If the command was given while the servers were still in the county's possession...