Stanford study says masks are totally ineffective; guy cites study on Twatter--which suspends his acct for "misleading"

If you're a college-age American, or an adult who's busy raising kids and keeping a roof over your head, you really have no idea how utterly totalitarian the Dem-ruled nation has become--incalculably aided by their allies in social media.

So here's just one example: Stanford is reportedly a very competent university.  So if a study by Stanford researchers found that wearing masks does absolutely nothing to reduce transmission of the chinese virus, would you think that was pretty reputable?

More specifically, if someone cited that study--again, by a very reputable outfit--would you think Twatter or Fakebook would be acting reasonably to suspend that person's account--for "violating our policy on spreading misleading or potentially harmful information about the virus"?

But of course Twatter and Fakebook both work for the Democrat party (or as we're starting to refer to it, The Party), so they can't tolerate anyone citing a study that contradicts the diktats of da great Fauci, supported by da Thief in Chief and his insurance policy.

Interesting:  Now Twatter won't even let you cite a study by one of the top universities in the country, if they don't like the result.  And yes, I realize twatter isn't da gruberment.  But it might as well be, just as Pravda never published letters critical of the Soviet regime.