NY Times claims you should ignore vote fraud, cuz...reasons

The NY Times is totally in the tank for Democrats/Biden/socialists/communists.  So naturally they're doing everything they can to make voters think Trump and his supporters are determined to maintain power even if voters vote them out.

Problem is, what if the Dems pull off massive vote fraud?  Does the Times expect Trump to simply concede in the face of massive fraud?

Why of course, dear.  Did you even need to ask?  So here's the Times' latest editorial:

“Imagine: It’s midnight, and the electoral map looks quite red. But news networks and election officials aren’t calling the swing states, as this year’s record numbers of mail-in and absentee ballots have yet to be fully counted,” the Times wrote in an editorial published Sunday.

“Mr. Trump, leading in the popular vote, decides he’s seen enough. He takes to his social media platforms and declares that he has won re-election and will accept no other result. He tells his tens of millions of followers that the Democrats and the press will try to change the result and steal the election. The door to unrest and constitutional crisis swings wide open.”

Got that?  You're expected to simply ignore any vote fraud.  Cuz that's the American way, right?

See, y'all shouldn't care about vote fraud, cuz hey, the Times wants you to believe vote fraud doesn't matter.  Cuz hey, what's a little fraud between friends, eh?

Of course according to the Times there's no vote fraud.  Keep that in mind, citizen:  The Times wants you to ignore fraud.  Cuz...reasons.