Mueller's testimony: Many think dud, but Dems got a HUGE win in what they wanted
The Democrats and their "progressive" and "Resistance" allies have been trying to torpedo Trump since early 2016--which is before he was even the GOP nominee, and at least nine months before the election.
Among the dozens of illegal ways they tried to do that was by begging "electors"--the citizens who actually cast the electoral votes decided by each individual state--from states that went for Trump to cast their vote for Hillary instead.
Wow!
When that failed they tried to cripple him by claiming that he "colluded with Putin" to somehow rig the vote in his favor. Two years later Mueller would report that he and his team of rabid Trump-haters found no evidence of that.
The Dems have also talked up the possibility of using the 25th Amendment to remove the president. For those who aren't political junkies, that's a way to remove a president who's claimed--by congress--to be crazy.
But the Great Hope for the Dems--their easy shot at removing the president--was Mueller's two-year investigation into charges that Trump "colluded with Russia"--allegedly to somehow steal the election from Democrats. They were absolutely certain Mueller would support the charge of collusion.
In case you hadn't heard, Mueller found no evidence of that. But the hope among the "elites" and Hollywood [spit] and the Resistance was SO intense that last December the bastards made a disgusting (from their standpoint, "cute") video. Watch these smug, smirking bastards as they gloat about what they're sure will be the impeachment of the most-successful president in over a century:
NOW: In Mueller's appearance the clever, well-rehearsed Democrats on the committee hammered the claim that Trump obstructed justice. In a series of brilliantly-scripted, leading questions they got Mueller to agree--with one-word "yes" answers--that all elements of obstruction were present. This was their goal, and now they'll decide what to do with that gift.
For months now, the Lying Mainstream Media has been claiming that Nancy Pelosi opposes impeachment--i.e. she's the "good cop," the sole voice of reason. The media did this to support Democrats. But it's a lie: Pelosi isn't the voice of reason; she and her fellow Dems want power, and will do anything to get it. She couldn't care less about putting the nation through impeachment if she thinks that will get her party the power she craves. And if the four whores of the apocalypse convince a majority of Americans to support impeachment, she'll "reluctantly" agree.
"Reluctantly." Uh-huh.
Now the entire thing comes down to this: If the Dems can show that the president "obstructed justice," does this qualify as "high crimes and misdemeanors" for purposes of impeachment?
Got a wild-ass guess how the Democrats will vote on that?
So...the Dems are perfectly positioned to flog "impeachment cuz obstruction" claim all the way to election day. And they will, led by the four most visible, most radical, most Trump-hating Democrat reps.
[As always, thanks to Streamable for their great free video-editing service.]
Among the dozens of illegal ways they tried to do that was by begging "electors"--the citizens who actually cast the electoral votes decided by each individual state--from states that went for Trump to cast their vote for Hillary instead.
Wow!
When that failed they tried to cripple him by claiming that he "colluded with Putin" to somehow rig the vote in his favor. Two years later Mueller would report that he and his team of rabid Trump-haters found no evidence of that.
The Dems have also talked up the possibility of using the 25th Amendment to remove the president. For those who aren't political junkies, that's a way to remove a president who's claimed--by congress--to be crazy.
But the Great Hope for the Dems--their easy shot at removing the president--was Mueller's two-year investigation into charges that Trump "colluded with Russia"--allegedly to somehow steal the election from Democrats. They were absolutely certain Mueller would support the charge of collusion.
In case you hadn't heard, Mueller found no evidence of that. But the hope among the "elites" and Hollywood [spit] and the Resistance was SO intense that last December the bastards made a disgusting (from their standpoint, "cute") video. Watch these smug, smirking bastards as they gloat about what they're sure will be the impeachment of the most-successful president in over a century:
NOW: In Mueller's appearance the clever, well-rehearsed Democrats on the committee hammered the claim that Trump obstructed justice. In a series of brilliantly-scripted, leading questions they got Mueller to agree--with one-word "yes" answers--that all elements of obstruction were present. This was their goal, and now they'll decide what to do with that gift.
For months now, the Lying Mainstream Media has been claiming that Nancy Pelosi opposes impeachment--i.e. she's the "good cop," the sole voice of reason. The media did this to support Democrats. But it's a lie: Pelosi isn't the voice of reason; she and her fellow Dems want power, and will do anything to get it. She couldn't care less about putting the nation through impeachment if she thinks that will get her party the power she craves. And if the four whores of the apocalypse convince a majority of Americans to support impeachment, she'll "reluctantly" agree.
"Reluctantly." Uh-huh.
Now the entire thing comes down to this: If the Dems can show that the president "obstructed justice," does this qualify as "high crimes and misdemeanors" for purposes of impeachment?
Got a wild-ass guess how the Democrats will vote on that?
So...the Dems are perfectly positioned to flog "impeachment cuz obstruction" claim all the way to election day. And they will, led by the four most visible, most radical, most Trump-hating Democrat reps.
[As always, thanks to Streamable for their great free video-editing service.]
posted by SF at
10:25 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home