How the Dem-fellating shills at CBS tried to discredit the story of Hunty bribem's laptop

Recently a few egotistical leftist TV "journalists" at "60 Minutes" decided they really ran that show, not their bosses.  Astonishingly, they were fired.  The dismissal emails are...amusing, and the exchange reveals a LOT about how biased the leftists in the media are.

Got me thinking:  When powerful demons (disguised as human) brazenly lie, cheat and steal--and get away with it (as they always do)--good, honest, moral, hard-working people are dismayed, and often console themselves by saying "Eventually the truth will be known."

I get it:  We'd all like to think the brazen liars and cheats and scammers and killers won't get away with it forever.  It's a coping mechanism, and without it I suspect we'd see a lot more drug overdoses.

Problem is that it often takes so many years for the truth to finally come out that the demons are never held to account for their orchestrated lies.  Moreover, if enough years have passed, most people tend to believe the story can't possibly be true--because it doesn't seem possible that such a huge, brazen lie could have been hidden for so long," eh?  The lie would surely have been discovered within a year or two.  "Just impossible to have kept it hidden for this long."

All that seems very logical...but it's all utter horseshit.  And to show ya I'd like to give you a VERY well-documented example from just six short years ago, so you can see for yourselves how lying, America-hating demons can get away with brazen lies for years.  (And possibly forever.) 

This particular "Op" to cover up the truth was carried out by Lesley Stahl, with the full support of the CBS propaganda outlet "60 Minutes."  Lesley's mission (and that of CBS) was to make voters reject a story that broke just three weeks before the 2020 election, about a laptop left at a repair shop by joe bribem's crack-addict son Hunty. 

In the fall of 2019 a man walked into a computer repair store in Wilmington, Delaware, asking if the owner could repair his dead laptop.  The customer  claimed to be Hunter Biden, and filled out a repair ticket with a phone number that matched one of Hunty's.

The shop owner--a life-long Democrat--repaired the laptop, and called the number on the ticket to tell the laptop's owner his computer was fixed and to pick it up.  Each call went to voicemail, and though the shop owner left several voice messages, no one ever picked up the laptop.

Per the terms of the repair contract, and state law, after 60 days the laptop was considered abandoned, so the shop owner took possession.  In examining the files on it, he found hundreds of pics of a man who was apparently Hunty smoking crack with young women, often nude.  

Okay, odd but no big problem: consenting adults, probably outside the U.S. so no U.S. laws broken, right?

But the laptop also contained something far more disturbing: hundreds of emails suggesting that Hunty had been Joe's bag-man when Joe was Obama's VP, raking in tens of millions of dollars in cash and costly gifts, seemingly for bogus reasons.

The shop owner--a life-long Democrat--was scared, because it suggested the bribem family was totally corrupt.  And by late 2019 Joe was starting to look like the probable presidential nominee for the Democrat party. 

As a long-time resident of Delaware, the owner knew calling Delaware cops would be useless: they were all bribem loyalists.  But there was a chance the FBI was honest. 

So he contacted the FBI and told 'em the story.  They person he talked with seemed totally bored.  "Thanks for calling."  But a few days later, in December of 2019, two FBI agents showed up at the repair shop.  After hearing the story they took the laptop--and the repair ticket.

Remember that date: December of 2019.

The shop owner waited, expecting to see headline news any day.  But not a peep.  Nothing.  But the shop owner knew what he'd seen--hundreds of pics of Hunty smoking crack with whores--and hundreds of emails describing sleazy "deals" with China, Russia and others.

The owner initially thought the reason the news hadn't broken was that the FBI was carefully building a case, but after months of nothing, by June of 2020 he realized the FBI had decided to hide the story.

But the owner had something the FBI didn't know about: a copy of the laptop's hard-drive.

Whoops.
Whoopsie.

SO...a life-long Democrat finds what seems to be solid evidence that the nation's recent VP--and the likely Democrat nominee for the 2020 election--is thoroughly corrupt, and he's turned that evidence over to the FBI, and...it seems that they've chosen to bury the story.  

This seems unbelievable to average Americans, until you read transcripts of emails between top FBI and DOJ officials under Obozo, conspiring to prevent Trump from winning the 2016 election--published by the Department of Justice later.

So, fearing that an FBI coverup was a bad sign for the future if not exposed, in mid-2020 the shop owner gives a copy of the drive to a Trump advisor/attorney.

The advisor gives a copy to Miranda Devine, editor of the New York Post.  The Post authenticates several of the emails, and three weeks before the 2020 election, on October 14th, the Post gets ready to run the story.  But before running it they call the bribem campaign to tell 'em about the forthcoming story and ask for comment.

Campaign staff says "this is nonsense."

Now let's review: the campaign knows the story is true: that Hunty abandoned a laptop at a repair shop, and that the Post says it has lots of pics and possibly incriminating emails on it.  It's not clear if the campaign knows the Post has a copy of the laptop's hard-drive. 

SO..."The election is in just three weeks!  How can we get voters to ignore this story?" 

Bribem "senior advisor" Tony Blinken (who bribem would later name Secretary of State) called former CIA acting director Mike Morell, asking him to draft a letter to be signed by dozens of retired intel agents (all Democrats), saying the story about the laptop "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian 'information operation'--that is, that it was a fake, a plant by Russia, designed to make Biden look corrupt and so throw the election to Trump." 

Within days the letter has been drafted and signed by 51 former U.S. intel agents.  And then within hours of the Post publishing this as their cover story, every Mainstream Media outlet has posted--NOT the story of the laptop, but its story about the 51 former intel agents discrediting the story.

Not a single Mainstream Media defense story mentions that not one of the 51 signers has examined the laptop,* so have no idea what it contains.

Within hours of the Post's publishing the laptop story on their front page, censors at pre-Musk Twatter blocked the NY Post's account, to prevent the Post from publicizing the story.  Twatter also deleted user posts mentioning it.

Six days after the Post broke the laptop story, and just 12 days before the election, CBS's Lesley Stahl interviewed Trump for the network's top "newz show," "60 Minutes." 

In one exchange Stahl repeatedly insists that the reason the media aren't covering the story is that the Post's story about the abandoned laptop “can’t be verified,” and that "reporters don’t report unverified information."

Trump insists that it CAN be verified, and asks Stahl why she thinks it can’t be.  Her answer: “Because it can’t be verified.”

But of course it could have been--because the FBI had had the laptop for ten MONTHS.  And months after the election, when it was obviously too late, the Washington Post DID verify that the laptop and its emails were authentic.

To this day most Democrats have either never heard about Hunty's laptop, or else believe the cover story bleated by the bribem campaign that it was a Russian "op."  No one ever asks "Why would the Russians want pro-military Trump to win instead of brain-dead liberal bribem?" 

Now watch how cunningly Google's "AI" propaganda-bot spins the story about Stahl's interview when asked "When did leslie stahl claim the story of hunter's laptop was fake?"

Google AI replied: "Stahl never claimed the story was definitively fake, but rather insisted it "can't be verified."  During the interview...Stahl replied, "Sir, let me tell you something. This is 60 Minutes, and we can't put on things that we can't verify". 

Except "60 Minutes" could have done any of a dozen things to verify the story: they could have asked the FBI if it had in fact seized a laptop from a specific computer repair shop in Wilmington.  If so, when was it seized?  They could have interviewed the owner of the shop.  Could have interviewed Post editor Miranda Devine.  They cunningly chose not to do ANY of those things, all of which would have shown the utter, total corruption of Joe Bribem--the man the media wanted to make president.

Again, months after the election, and months after bribem was installed as prez, both the Washington Post and the NY Times admitted that the story about Hunty's abandoned laptop was true.  It was just another case of the Democrat-fellatiing Media protecting a Democrat candidate. 

Mission accomplished, again.