NY Times finally admits bribem ordered open borders...but AGAINST the wishes of the Democrat Party!

Amazing.  Utter horseshit.  The Times is trying to rewrite history to help the Democrat party win control of congress in 2026 and the presidency in 2028.  All prior statements by Dem leaders are being deleted, and four months from now no Democrat will remember what really happened--thanks to the Lying Mainstream Media.

The Times has created a new, fake Narrative, in which no Democrat leader EVAH supported open borders!  Nope nope nope!  In fact the Times now claims Dem "leaders" (and potential candidates) actually warned bribem NOT to throw the border wide open!  Yep yep yep!

Here's the headline from the lying whores at the Times:

How Biden Ignored Warnings...and Lost Americans' Faith in Immigration

Notice just "immigration."  Omitting the crucial word "illegal," as liberals ALWAYS do.

The Democratic president and his top advisers rejected recommendations that could have eased the border crisis that helped return Donald Trump to the White House.

The Times claims unnamed "leaders" of the Democrat Partei warned bribem and his "top advisers" NOT to throw open the borders, warning that such a move would plunge the country into chaos.  But the Times now claims bribem--and only bribem--demanded open borders, and that all other Democrat leaders heroically tried to resist what they knew would be disaster.  SEE?

In the weeks after Joe Biden was elected, advisers delivered a warning: His approach to immigration could prove disastrous.

Wait...in their first 'graf the Times claims bribem's advisers ignored warnings.  Look back up: "...his top advisers rejected recommendations...." But in the very next 'graf the Times claims "advisers delivered a warning."  Which is it, lying assholes?  Did his advisers warn him, or reject a warning?  You neither know nor care, because your whole Narrative and is a lie: the entire leadership of the fucking treasonous Democrat party embraced open borders.  You just want that inconvenient fact to disappear, so your stupid base will keep voting Dem in future elections.

Mr. Biden had pledged to treat unauthorized immigrants more humanely than Trump, who generated widespread backlash by separating migrant children from their parents.

You lying whores would never say "illegal immigrants."  They're always "unauthorized" or "undocumented Americans."  And you lying whores KNOW that separating children from parents was ORDERED by leftist judges during Obozo's reign, but that doesn't help the Democrats, so you simply...omit that inconvenient fact, eh?  SO classic!

...in the final weeks of 2020 experts advising his transition team warned that his positions threatened to drastically increase border crossings.

Notice how neatly the Times gets readers to accept the brazen lie that open borders was just bribem's position, rather than being eagerly supported by every leader of the rat-bastard Democrat party: simply by use of the possessive "his positions."  Masterful!  You didn't even notice.

That drastic increase, they said, could provoke a political crisis.  Advisers used the word "chaos" in a memo during the campaign, and they offered a range of options to avert that crisis, by better deterring migrants.  
   Mr. Biden seemed to grasp the risk, but he and his top aides failed to act on those recommendations.

The new Narrative--the lie to win the Dems more votes--is now obvious.  But how can we know it's a lie?  Because the Times doesn't cite sources or emails or any evidence.
   Times whores: "Dat quite reasonable, deplorable!  Cuz ouah sources understandably don't wanna be named!"
   They don't wanna be named because they don't exist.  If they existed, you'd think they'd want credit for having been right, eh?

The warnings came true, and then some.  After Mr. Biden became president, migrant encounters at the southern border quickly doubled, then kept rising. New arrivals overwhelmed border stations, then border towns, and eventually major cities like New York and Denver.

We note you cunningly didn't mention Chitcongo, Memphis, Nashville, Phoenix or San Diego.  Nor that the bribem regime *flew thousands of illegals from Texas to Westchester county (a few miles north of NYC) at 3 a.m.  We have the radar tracks, and the videos of illegals getting off the planes at 3am, protected by bribem "ice agents" from being questioned by the rare curious American.  But the Times and other Lying Mainstream Media never said a word--because you supported this policy all along.  And still do. 

Anger over illegal migration [due to open borders] helped return Mr. Trump to the presidency, and he has enacted even more aggressive policies than those Mr. Biden first campaigned against. Mr. Trump has drawn outrage from Democrats by sending masked agents to target immigrants, often aided by National Guard soldiers.

Notice how quickly the Times pivots from "Leaders of the Partei warned bribem but he refused to listen" to "Dis all Trump's fault!  Trump mean!  ICE BAD cuz dey wears masks!  By contrast, protesters [rioters] who wear masks iz guuuud."
   Open borders was solely due to Biden, citizen!  He was the only Dem who demanded that, and the sole cause of the chaos (their word).  And now that he's out, the Democrat Partei is Perfect!
   The Times calls itself "the paper of record," and their piece writes a fake version of "history" so future voters will only know the Democrat-fellating version of events.

Former Biden administration officials told The Times that Mr. Biden and his circle of close confidants -- including Ron Klain, who was chief of staff during the president's first two years, Mike Donilon, Jennifer O'Malley Dillon and Anita Dunn -- made two crucial errors.
    First, they underestimated the scale of migration that was coming.  Second, they failed to appreciate the political reaction to that migration, believing a "border surge" [you mean ten million new illegals, assholes?] would not be an important issue to most voters.

See, the Democrat party NEVAH supported open borders!  Nope nope nope!  Just bribem and his top advisers.  
   Oh wait:  in the Democrat primary presidential debate of 2016--cunningly scheduled by Hillary Clinton for Christmas Eve so that almost no one would see it--both Hillary and Bernie Sanders vowed that if elected they wouldn't deport a single illegal alien.
   And Gavin Newsom just bragged on X that he got California to give "free" healthcare to illegal aliens.  Seems like that's supporting illegal immigrants/open borders, eh?  So how will the Times spin that one into "Dis not ouah policy"? 

Democrat voters will believe everything the Times bleated, and will vote Dem forever--because they automatically believe anything printed or bleated by the Mainstream Media.  And they're totally unable to connect cause and effect.

When American girls are raped and murdered by "men" whose home nation is carefully never named by the Lying Mainstream Media, the Media have a ready excuse:  "American citizens commit rape and murder at a higher rate than 'immigrants.'"  How often have you heard that horseshit?

As Hitler and his propaganda minister discovered, lying works.  And the more brazen the lie, the more supporters believe it.  Dem voters believe anything the Lying Mainstream Media tells 'em, which is why the Media keep lying: it works!  But only for Dems, because the Media quickly attacks any effort by conservatives to lie.

Several easy logic tests will show the reality: If the rest of the Democrat party didn't support open borders and unlimited illegal alien invasion, why are ALL Dems now fighting so hard to prevent ICE from deporting ANY illegal--even ones who have committed crimes in the U.S.?

The obvious answer is that all Democrat leaders have always supported open borders.  If any opposed open borders they cunningly said nothing, for fear of being cancelled by the Partei.

Source: Ace of Spades

Original NY Times revisionist history here. 

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=417663

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/07/us/politics/biden-immigration-trump.html