Who would scream that requiring photo-ID to vote is a bad thing? Wait...of course!

 

One party wants honest elections, and thus wants voters to show photo-ID to prove their identity, to eliminate at least THAT method of vote fraud.  But the Dems block photo-ID laws every time, claiming it jus' beez TOO HARD fo' some folk to get photo-ID even if the state offers it fo' FREE!

Now why do ya suppose dat iz, eh?

Sure.  Obvious.  The Democrats WANT pipo to be able to vote two or three times--i.e. vote fraud.  Now the only question is...why?

Wow, dat iz reeeally a poser, eh?

No it's not!  Just like allowing ballots to be dropped into "drop boxes," or eliminating the requirement for witness signatures on mail-in ballots.  Or corrupt Dem "election workers" okaying mail-in ballots with an illegible scrawl for a "signature"--when the real sig is right next to it, making the fraud obvious.

Is it not obvious?  ALL those things make massive election fraud easy.  So we get things like a 3a.m. "ballot dump" in which 99% of the "votes" were for biden.  Not f'n likely, but...corrupt Dem judges refuse to hear open-court testimony from eyewitnesses, ignore sworn affidavits, bleat that no one has "legal standing" to sue, and so on.

I get that one can bleat that requiring photo-ID to vote is supposedly "voter suppression," but none of the other things are.  Instead all those vulnerabilities are intended to allow massive vote fraud.  There's no other excuse.  

Getting the picture yet? 

When Philly reports ten percent more votes for Cackles than the number of people eligible to vote (not just "registered," because corrupt Dem-ruled states now allow same-day registration!), they expect you to just shrug and say "Eh, somehow dat jus' fine!"

Your country is being stolen from you--openly, brazenly--and they expect you to smile.