And now for something unrelated to the election: duh faaaabulous cool thing, "SRM"

Ever see the acronym "SRM"?

You almost certainly haven't.  But like "AI" the "elites" are funding it, and "manufacturing consensus" to make it "the next faaabulous 'in' thing."  Which means the Democrat party will make it their policy soon.

"SRM" pushes *every* orgasmic button the co-called elites have.  It's already attracted all the billionaire donors, which makes it as certain as passing rules to stop the sale of gasoline-powered cars or taxing ranchers for the number of cattle they raise.

Bill Gates was one of the first billionaires to back the study of the topic a decade ago. Last year the CEO of "OpenAI" expressed support for SRM research.

Numerous billionaire venture capitalists are backing SRM, betting it'll be Democrat policy in a year or two.  The Simons Foundation, founded by late hedge fund billionaire Jim Simons, has committed $50 million to fund SRM research.  All the "cool kidz" are backing it, which means it's gonna be Democrat policy soon.

The main reason it's being touted as the greatest thing EVAH is that it's being pushed as the solution for what Democrats and socialists claim is "duh mos' dire threat to life on Earth EVAH":  Global Warming.

"Wait," say Democrats, "din't yew get duh memo?  We don' call it 'Global Warming' now!  Now it's 'Climate Change' cuz we decided CO2--which we claim is causing all Global Warming--ALSO causes duh local climate to cool in some places!"

Well yes, but "SRM" is only claimed to cool the planet.  Cuz duh backers say cooling duh Erf will also stop those places that were getting colder from getting colder!  No one has explained how dat gon' work, in part because no reporter has asked.  But we're sure there's a good explanation.  One popular theory is "Magic."

Promising to stop Globull Worming has opened the wallets of every Warmie scare-group, leading to a $40 million commitment from the Quadrature Climate Foundation, a UK-based nonprofit.  So right on cue, the socialists at Bloomberg Magazine run this headline:

Silicon Valley’s Elite Pour Money Into SRM

Sub-head: "Venture capitalists, startup founders and tech executives are funding studies, experiments and small deployments of a technology that could cool the planet."

But before I tell you what SRM is, consider this:  If Donald Trump or Elon Musk pushed a technology that they demanded be funded by the U.S. government, but which could change the climate in a way that couldn't be undone, how do ya think the Dems who run the Lying Mainstream Media would react, eh?

Of course: sneering ridicule, then screams of "They're trying to KILL YOUR KIDS."  Then lawfare to block it.  But because SRM has the backing of Dems and the "elites," it's gonna sail right through.

So what the hell does "SRM' stand for?

"Solar Radiation Management."

Democrat: "Ya mean like white shingles on your roof in Arizona to reduce the load on your air conditioners?  How can anyone be worried about dat?"

See, that's exactly the response the folks who coined that soothing term intended.  But what it really is is a plan to use special high-altitude jet planes to spray millions of tons of sulfur dioxide into the air every year.  Those particles would reflect a "small portion" of incoming sunlight, cutting global temperature.

The main problem with this is that once the particles were injected, that couldn't be undone.  Just like the covid "vaccine," eh?  If it had an effect duh "experts" didn't predict, and it was bad, sorry about that!

Another problem is that spewing, say, two million tons of the stuff every year would require about 125,000 flights per year at 60,000 feet.

For Americans born after 1980, or who know nothing about events, back in the 80s there was a huge scare about "a hole in the ozone layer" that was allowing harmful ultraviolet light to reach the surface.  UV light causes cancer.

The "hole" was blamed on "CFCs"--gases like Freon, which was being used in spray paint, spray deodorants, hairspray and lots of other things.  That research was taken so seriously that the U.S. government banned CFCs in all spray products.

But researchers also claimed jets flying at 60,000 feet would damage the ozone layer the same way.  That claim was taken so seriously that the U.S. government cancelled the American version of the "supersonic transport" rather than risk worsening the problem.

And yet now the "SRM" investors want 125,000 flights to 60,000 feet every year to work their investing magic, eh?

Starting to see how utterly corrupt this entire enterprise is?  The "dire threat" of 1980 is simply...ignored.  Waved away, because the elites see a chance to make billions of dollars...doing an experiment that cannot be undone!

Keep your eyes open.  Remember that you heard the real story here first.  Because you will NOT hear a critical word about duh faaaabulous SRM anywhere else.

Source: Bloomberg Mag

 https://archive.is/KEMlI