Dem Swalwell knew 53 witnesses had NO evidence, yet tweets that he still believes the FBI

Eric Swalwell is a Democrat congress-creep from the Dem-ruled state of California.  He's a member of the Democrat-run House Intelligence committee.

That committee investigated the Dems' claim that Trump "colluded with Russia" to steal the 2016 election from Hilliary.  To do this they called 53 witnesses who had appeared on CNN and MSNBC claiming to have "certain knowledge" that this had in fact happened.

Every single witness had appeared on CNN and MSNBC--some of them scores of times--claiming he or she had "certain, solid evidence" that Trump had "colluded with Russia" to steal the election.  But when put under oath, behind closed doors in secret testimony, a totally weird thing happened--so weird you won't believe it.

Every single witness--every one of the 53 called by the Dem-ruled committee--witnesses they were confident would provide "certain, solid evidence" of "collusion"--said they had NO evidence at all.

Isn't that weird?  In front of the cameras they said "I have certain evidence of collusion."  But then when under oath, in secret testimony, they said the exact opposite.

Did you hear about that on the Lying Mainstream Media?  If so, did they tell you what that meant?  (Not that one needs to be told, but the Media was SO eager to ram "collusion" down our throats for years, that you might think that when not a single witness said they actually had "evidence," the media would be just as willing to report that, eh?

Hahahahahahahaha!  I see you just arrived on this planet!  Enjoy your visit!

Well...Swalwell had the GALL to jump on Twatter and say he didn't trust the acting director of national intelligence, who had just de-classified and released transcripts of most of the 53 Dem-picked witnesses saying "no, I didn't have any evidence of collusion."  Swalwell said "I trust the FBI, not the Director of National Intelligence."

Except the released transcripts showed that the committee Swalwell sat on--Adam Schiff's corrupt committee--had NO evidence of collusion.  The transcripts showed that beyond any dispute or doubt.  The Dems' entire claims had just been blown up, yet Swalwell was saying he didn't trust the DNI, Ric Grenell.  But the transcripts speak for themselves, and show that Swalwell and the Dems have been lying since the beginning.

But hey, Twatter lets Swalwell hang himself.  Fine by me.

So Ric Grenell--the guy who de-classified and released the transcripts showing Swalwell and the Dems were lying--blasted Swalwell:

I’m letting the public see more info. You are the one who worked to hide the information you didn’t like. You listened to multiple people in classified hearings say they had no evidence and yet go on TV and say the opposite. Transparency is now a must! https://t.co/C0pKnneuoh

— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) May 22, 2020

So finally, after three long years, the truth has come out.  Yet Swalwell still IMPLIES collusion, and that the FBI has been telling the truth all along--despite the texts showing they were plotting to try to block Trump and impeach him.

Of course you DID hear about all this, right?  Right?  Sure you did, cuz the media reported it, right?

No?  Wow, I'm...shocked.  Totally shocked.  This is my shocked face.

As election day approaches watch for the Dems to claim that there really WAS solid, certain evidence that Trump colluded with Russia, despite the truth revealed in the 53 transcripts.  And half of voters will believe 'em.