What if there's proven, massive vote fraud Nov 2nd?

As we reach one week before the election, I'm starting to see blog posts cautioning conservatives to watch your local polling place for suggestions of vote fraud. Some suggest using cell-phone cameras to document obvious violations.

Which led me to think: Why bother documenting election fraud?

Seriously. We have a preznit who, when challenged on his eligibility to hold that office, refused to let an impartial panel view and authenticate his birth certificate--and the nation's judges simply yawned. It would appear that the judiciary doesn't believe the laws should be enforced if doing so would aggravate certain groups.

Same deal with election fraud: You could have hours of video documenting the fraud in detail, with absentee ballots allegedly submitted by Joe Smith, along with Joe's affidavid swearing that he voted in person, but do you think the courts would take any action?

You could literally have dozens of boxes of ballots being "found" in car trunks weeks after an election went to the GOP candidate by a razor-thin margin--and voila!: the newly discovered ballots are just barely enough to swing the election to the Dem. And the courts yawn.

Both these things actually happened--not in some lawless third-world hole but right here in the good ol' US of A--and the courts said the legal equivalent of "We couldn't care less."

The Dems and "progressives" have elevated election fraud to a routine, yet the courts appear generally uninterested. Why would anyone think things would be different this year?

Hakuna Matata, citizen. Just smile and be happy.