58 Dems in congress vote NO on a resolution condemning Kirk's assassination

Imagine if, after Martin Luther King jr. was assassinated, the U.S. House had introduced a simple resolution condemning his murder--and 58 members of congress voted NO on that resolution.   

Think every so-called "reporter" in the Mainstream Media would have asked the No voters why they voted No on that simple, reasonable resolution?  Damn right they would have. 

SO...after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, a resolution was introduced in the U.S. House condemning that murder.  Seems totally unobjectionable, eh?  Who supports assassination, right?

58 Democrat "members of congress" (hereafter shortened to "congresswhores") voted against that seemingly rational resolution.

If we had an honest Mainstream Media, reporters would ask every one of those bastards why they voted No on a resolution condemning an assassination.  But of course not a single leftist "journalist" will ever ask a Democrat congresswhore why they voted against it.

And the Dems will never answer that question if asked by a conservative reporter. 

Thus is the perfect defensive circle closed:  Democrat congresswhores will refuse to condemn assassination, or vote against God or children or America, or do whatever the hell they want, knowing they'll never have to answer for it--because their devoted followers will continue to vote for 'em forever.